nothing but time
350
take the 5167
The RM is too chunky to enjoy during swimming/watersports. Wearing the 5167 wet, intimates that you have another, more complicated model for dry wear.
If you had to get one of these - which would it be?
The Patek Aquanaut 5167 The Richard Mille RM010 in Titanium Although I like the RM - Feel that the Vaucher movement is a little too simple to justify the price (perhaps also true of the Aquanaut), but I do feel (with absolutely no grounds whatsoever, and ...
RM010
Not the best picture (RM's always look better in the flesh) and the white gold is nicer than the TI IMO. The 5167, whilst not hideous, is certainly an ugly watch. Try both on and they're so different, one will speak to you more than the other
Between the 2, My pick is also RM
I prefer RM010 Ti or (I owned) RM005FM. To me the Nautilus or Aquant are ugly watches. My favorite simple PP is 5124G or 5196P
My wife innocent comments
My wife thinks RM is ugly and look cheap. AP ROO looks better if you want a big watch.