Watchlover42
1086
I prefer the 5270 to the 5970....
.....as the subdials aren't as centrally positioned due to the larger and perfectly proportioned movement.
I also had the 3970 in my collection and find it stunningly beautiful. Unfortunately, its proportions on the wrist never completely convinced me.
I'm too poor for the 1518 and 2499 😢
The 5270G-001 was the logical solution for me. The first PCC with the in-house movement. And, in my opinion, the most versatile version, even when I like the J very much.
Patek Philippe ref. 5270J-001
A few weeks ago, I've been able to try on this ref. 5270J-001 and was amazed at how refined it looks and how well it sits on the wrist , even on a smaller wrist like mine. I had in mind the way this reference has been criticised for its larger case ( 41 x...
I share your view on this reference.
I was lucky to see and try all the ancestors at numerous auction previews, all fantastic and off course a dream, but my all time favorite is the 3970, and then this 5270, preferably the “chin”variant. Same as you mentioned, I thought that it’s to large, b...
Thank you for your comment and for the kind words.
I would imagine that a 4 Hz movement is reliable as a daily companion. But obviously only an owner can tell! Best, Emmanuel
Glad that you tried it on and thanks for the review Emmanuel !
This J version has a vintage look and feel to it, making the watch quite charming ! Your wish list on Pateks is growing and the poison deepens !
Magnificent!!!
An absolute pleasure for the eyes! Though I find the earlier references' size much more appealing, who am I to be fussy! Just magnificent!
While I much prefer 5970 to 5270, the 5270 is also very appealing. I have tried on several of the 5270 variants and here are some of my impressions …
I like the way the registers at 3 and 9 only have one function complemented by the circular windows below. It sets the 5270 apart from 5970 in a significant and sensible way. At an auction viewing right next to each other were a 5970R and 5270R. I careful...
Thank you for sharing your impressions, Patekova.
It's good to know that, in real life, the 5270 can be compared to the 5970 without blemishing too much! Best, Emmanuel
The chin is the only thing I'm personally not fond of.
I prefer the first version without scale or the later variants with the chin removed.
To me, they're all nice.
The chin really doesn't bother me that much. I liked it when it came out. And even when the chin part was pointed out to me, I didn't like it much less. Although I do admit, I can't unsee the chin now. I also kind of like the Vacheron Constantin 5000T in ...
I’ve tried on the rose gold 5000T,
but the 43 mm case felt too large for my wrist. And the 1142 QP caliber is almost identical aesthetically to the 1142 of my CdV, so it feels a little less attractive for me.
I remember it felt thicker on my wrist than the Patek 5270J and 5270G.
The VC looked thicker than the Patek equivalents, although statistically, they're probably not really thicker. Yes. It's a virtually identical Lemania movement as your CdV, so you've got that base covered!
Petal really know what they are doing with the perpetual calendar chronographs, regardless of the reference.
They all have their appealing features, including the 5270. Thanks for the pictures Emmanuel. All the best, Jon
Yes, to some extent one could say that this complication almost belongs to Patek Philippe (even if it's a silly statement).
Thanks for your comment, Jon! Best, Emmanuel
My grail.
I saw a Patek PCC in a magazine as a teenager and was mesmerized. It is the epitome of horology for me. I was fortunate to acquire the 5270J on my 40th birthday, which makes it an incredible milestone in journey.
The movement is a big upgrade over the Lemania, but the hands are a downgrade
On the 1518 to 5970 the hands were vaulted and three-dimensional, on the current ones they are so flat and plain
Interesting point, which didn't catch my eye.
But then, I've never seen a 5970 in real life...
It's a fantastic watch.
The only problem is, like with nearly all Patek chronos, that the scalling on the dial is wrong. 4Hz would ask for four subsecond marks, not five.
One of the most beautiful reference...
and possibly my favourite for those within my reach. The fact that it has so many variants just adds to its appeal (though some feels this dilutes its value), as we all can find our own favourite. Many here feels it lives under the shadow of its esteemed ...
Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts, your experience and this photo of your fantastic duo!
I personally prefer the two you have to the blue G and green P. Just my taste of course. Anyway, thanks again. Best, Emmanuel
I prefer the 5270 to the 5970....
.....as the subdials aren't as centrally positioned due to the larger and perfectly proportioned movement. I also had the 3970 in my collection and find it stunningly beautiful. Unfortunately, its proportions on the wrist never completely convinced me. I'...
I like the 5270G-001 very much.
The absence of thacymeter scale makes it very clean and uncluttered. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and experience! Best, Emmanuel
I think because of its complications. It is thick and has a bigger case. But still understandable. My opinion. 😊
Still a great, good watch. Tfs. Geross.
On the wrist, it feels very refined, much more than I would have thought.
Thanks for chiming in. Cheers, Emmanuel