WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Omega

The problem with the notion...

 

that a lack of coat(s) of shellac denotes a dial that is not original, is that it is difficult – if not impossible – to explain how and/or why anyone would produce an otherwise perfect example. An independent artisan who was (or is) capable of producing dials that are virtually indistinguishable from originals would make much more money doing high-end dial restorations. It does not make sense – except when there are other signs suggesting that the dial in question is not original.

I have no doubt that both this Omega dial and my 666 dial were originally manufactured by their respective company's sub-contractors. As to why some less-than-perfect examples appear on occasion, I suspect the simple answer is that, especially 50 years ago, quality control was also less than perfect.

  login to reply