Dr No
[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
37737
Cal 8929 would fit our Rails . . .
. . . handily. That's precisely why I'm disgruntled over the issue. Omega could've created a comparable movement without decoration to make the 60th anniversary models truly representative of the original CK 2914.
Art
When all you need to know is the time
No date or moon phase needed on this piece of classic elegance. Cheers Drew ...
Couldn't agree more!
As a recent fellow railmaster owner, i find that having no date or other distraction is quite relaxing, and that's coming from a day/day-date watch guy!
A lovely watch, which should deserve a manual winding movement.
Here is my rusty ancestor. ...
I noticed not one, but two PAF seamaster/railmaster’s for sale today on their website
Rare birds fly together?
Cal 8929 would fit our Rails . . .
. . . handily. That's precisely why I'm disgruntled over the issue. Omega could've created a comparable movement without decoration to make the 60th anniversary models truly representative of the original CK 2914. Art
Well, if they don't . . .
. . . they should start now. And we'll be the first two in line, right?
Well, to send an anniversary Rail back to Omega for retrofitting a manual wind movement, Nicolas . . .
. . . you first have to have the anniversary Rail.
You're never far from my thoughts, Nicolas . . .
. . . especially when it comes to Ω chronometers. You must have one someday. That's my mission. 😉
If it had 100m water resistance
And a screw down crown, I would never take it off. I find I wear it more than any other watch, including some which are quite a bit more expensive.
60m is good! I agree
But If you wanted to have some fun and could improve an already great watch what would you do? Keep auto with better wr or make it manual?
60m is good! I agree
But If you wanted to have some fun and could improve an already great watch what would you do? Keep auto with better wr or make it manual?