And talking about the original "Bond" Seamaster

May 14, 2016,21:05 PM
 

I once did a quick and improvised pictorial comparison between the first "Bond" Seamaster and the lastest (maybe the last?), with ceramic bezel an dial. You will notice that size is the same ans porportions are almost the same. The second incarnation, the Co-axial Bond, received longer hands, which I find quite interesting, and framed luminous material on the dial, giving it a luxurious look. This have those same features, plus the shiny and smooth dial and the ceramic bezel. Not everyone fell in love with this last incarnation, though... Anyway, the bracelet kept the same design, almost impossible to tell the different when looking right at the face of it, but pretty clear differences on the side. Screwed links (not necessarilly a upgrade) and quite heavier (also not quite a upgrade for everyone's taste). Last, but not least, the case thickness grew a lot and although it's ok for today's standards, it ruined one of the greatest qualities of the original Bond's Seamaster and the other contemporaneous Seamaster Professional 300M: the incredibly slim case, specially for a 300 meter resistant watch, which made one of the most confortable 300m watches ever. The Seamaster 300M in titanium was even more confortable. Here are the pictures. Best regards. Adriano


























































More posts: Seamaster

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Movement...

 
 By: gmark2800 : May 14th, 2016-22:33
People blame the co-axial movement thickness for the increased case thickness.

Yes but this is not the case

 
 By: Adriano : May 15th, 2016-10:22
As the movement is a caliber 2500D, which is basically the same as the good old 1120 (or 1108) of the original, just with different escapement. All based on the ETA 2892A2 and with the same dimensions. So this was really a aesthetic decision, not technica... 

This is like salt on my wound

 
 By: Poky : May 15th, 2016-01:50
For some stupid reason I let go of my original seamaster. This brings back all the good memories. It was/is truly a comfortable and capable watch and above all, it looks great. Just look at that wavy dial.

Oh I have been waiting for this post....Alas!!

 
 By: redcorals : May 15th, 2016-06:13
I have my own Qs on this series. But first the rhetoric - 1. Original will always be considered the Classic as it was a game changer, avant garde piece which took the mkt in a certain direction. Then it usually stays in the mkt for a long duration till sa... 

On my wrist since 1997....

 
 By: fabietto : May 15th, 2016-11:43
but still in love! Not anymore alone so now not on my wrist....but summer is coming, soon again on my wrist ...