but I have to concede that I agree with both Marc and Don. To take away the timekeeping indicator of an already existing watch is not exactly what I would call original, innovative or even interesting. Romain Jerome was criticised heavily for coming up with a similar product (albeit created from the start to be a sculpture rather than watch, but more 'commercial' in design and execution). And now Beat?
How much is the H8 more a 'wearable sculpture that accompanies him wherever he goes' than the H1? What is the specific intellectual/conceptual/philosophical/aesthetic contribution that makes this kinetic sculpture so outstanding? If I am allowed to be cynical, my question would be: 'Have we now already reached a status where Tourbillons have become a commodity even with independent makers?'
I obviously do not 'get it'. As much as I admire Beat's work, this one leaves me with a bitter aftertaste.
Best,
Magnus