WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

And again...

 

Why do I always allow myself to be drawn into these discussion ... smile

I've seen a couple of wonderful sculptures of someone meditating. A flatish piece of stone has had the shape of a meditating monk carved inside it - solid stone surrounding a monk-shaped void. A lovely way of showing the "emptimess" of the state achieved by meditation.

Look at a Potter pocket watch - his bridge layout is totally different to most other pocket watches. If you were to run a solid modeler on a watch movement and visualise the bridges, baseplate etc as voids you'd realise that most of the space in a watch is unused. Potter seems to have understood this. The designers of the new AP with the Robin escapement seem to be one of the first to be managing space and volume with an architects' understanding, not a mechanics.

To me, the vast majority of skeletonising isn't an intelligent use of voids or "absence" - it's just using lack of metal as a form of decoration. I wonder if anyone will ever design a skeletonised watch from scratch and use the voids intelligently.

I guess I'm trying to say that the mere absence of something isn't sufficient, but am probably not expressing it well.

nick

  login to reply