sham1
9768
So true Nico
which makes my decision to choose one of them even more difficult.
33, 37 or 40?
By: sham1 : April 17th, 2020-02:00
Like many of you, I have been browsing the internet too often during these challenging times and needless to say, there are some lovely watches out there that make compelling purchases. Sometimes though as much as all the alternatives scream 'buy me, buy ...
Thank you
By: Cozmopak : April 17th, 2020-19:05
For the clarification. Between these three, I would still go for Kikuchi. The Patek is too small, and the Jurgensen is too big. Also, the Jugensen dial is a bit flat to me. I like their guilloche work, but not this. The Murakamo is an exercise in case fin...
Absolutely John!
By: sham1 : April 18th, 2020-08:03
Except I only have one vintage piece because although vintage pieces have so much character and are wonderfully small relatively, I tend to worry about their reliability. Some are ok, some are not. My 1943 Patek is currently in Geneva for a service that w...
Murakamo or 5022P for me...
By: trs : April 17th, 2020-08:36
I don't like the Urban Jurgensen for its dial color, hour hand, the lugs and foremost its size which I find far too large for a basic dress watch. This leaves the Murakamo and the 3960G. Between those two I would pick the Murakamo w/o any doubt as the 396...
Interesting choices
By: Blue and White : April 17th, 2020-14:13
....and beautiful watches, all three of them. My view on each: Patek: + gorgeous case (hunterback) + strongest brand - a tad too small (but white color makes it bigger) - subdial cuts into "6" Nakagawa: + beautifully elevated (3-dimensional) numerals + be...
Wisdom these days
By: sham1 : April 19th, 2020-20:43
comes so well disguised Ron! Thank you for your feedback. I am leaning towards the Murakumo as I am pretty certain that it will be a better fit on my wrist not to mention I love the raised numerals and three dimensional hands.