aaronm
2923
I happen to like
Breguet's use of the watch number on the dial, a nice little retro quirk.
I don't mind a small "product line" nameplate, like the "ingenieur" at 6'oclock on the IWC or the "Delphis" on the Chronoswiss, nor a small indication, like the "Return a vol" on the Breguet XXI. I mind pointless indications, like writing "chronographe" on a chronograph, and HATE pointless subdial labels, like the recent Piaget chrono or JLC and any number of other brands writing "Reserve de Marche" over what can ONLY be a power-reserve indicator.
I am not a huge fan of the use of "Chronometre" or "Certified....", just because it takes up so much space. On the other hand, I am somewhat nostalgically entertained by the older Roger Dubuis with the Bullentin d'Observatoire.
A
Writing on the dial... when, if ever, is it okay?
Gents, I was enjoying pics of a tourbillon today, when the whole spectacle was ruined by A BUNCH OF WRITING ALL OVER THE DIAL. I am of the school that even the word 'automatic' is pushing it. But it occasionally balances a dial nicely, this one word. I'm ...
Completely Agree, Mostel
KIll off "Reserve de Marche", "Tourbillon" often placed around the exposed cage - what else would it be? The only acceptable ones are "Chronometre" and even then I only like it on vintage pieces. Depth rating is OK (when it's not some stupid depth and act...
I also agree
Often, it just distracts from the overall picture and it doesn't give any valuable info as the owner probably knows what he wears . Sometimes, like you pointed out, it is nice to balance a dial. As we have seen with some pieces (Ochs & Junior), no wri...
I also have a fairly narrow view
If the watch has a solid case back I can see the argument for having "Automatic" on the dial as a reasonable person may not know it is automatic, especially if buying the watch a couple of decades after it was produced. I have a harder time accepting: - C...
Agree, but not on 100%
A agree for "simple simplicity"... That is really good working method for desining a watch. And I really appereciate it. But sometimes "overlettering" have sense. "Overlettering" is very destructive for dial design when designer is losing taste and put le...
Rolex--no way to explain why--is an exception
I can't tell you why it does not bother me on Rolexes... but it doesn't. IN fact, as I've said 1000 times, my favorite casual watch is my Sub LV. Maybe because this sort of writing is 'very Rolex'?
Complete De-Badging
is my ideal. All the writing on the dial not only distracts from the design or even reduces legibility, in many cases it seems to me a sign of insecurity: we're not 100% sure that people recognise our product, so we had better spelll it out for them. IMHO...
Insecurity--indeed!
I have to agree!!! But I once mentioned this about a specific brand and got FLAMED in a big, big way. No one wants to think their favorite watchmaker is insecure and needs to write 'Muscles' on his biceps! (I totally, utterly agree with you!!!) But again,...
Ah...but there r anomaly
Normally, i totally agree with uall on this as i too prefer discreet Armani style over flamboyant Versace. However, a little while ago i have fallen in love with perhaps the mother of all sin and did struggled... pic curtsy of Kong then i was secured enou...
An example of de-badging.....
What do you think of the de-badging? Right: Original St Gallen Disinfectable Rescue Left: De-badged PuristSPro All-Black Rescue (PPro ABR) Also changed yellow to green safety zone, all-red luminous seconds hand, stealth black SuperLuminova PPro logo at 6 ...
I definitely prefer the one on the left.
Now can it be this easy with.... "Insert Over-badged Brand" here???
I have nothing against a light Writing, like the Brand, for example.
If it is not too visble, and if it is not located in a stupid place. As we speak about Writings, what about a sterile one? No marking at all, nor on the dial, nor on the case back... Best, Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2009-12-07 23:1...
Is that a (forgive my ignorance) Rolex?
Funny, Rolex would look naked without the writing. Thanks Nicolas!
No, Mostel..This is a Benrus Type I so called Sterile because of
The total lack of writings... A very special watch, used by the Navy Seals in the 70ies. Best, Nicolas
Well, I prefer a light writing on the dial....
I don´t understand the "books" writted in the dials, as happen in Rolex, for example. In Rolex I prefer the No Cosc models because the writings on the dials are no so "heavy". In general, I don´t like the extremely writted dials. Less is more, I think... ...
I also thought about the Cali, Emilio. Nice example!
This message has been edited by amanico on 2009-12-08 08:38:40
i do agree too
i do agree with you about how writing sometimes on the dial creats a whole lot of mess, a non balanced look, on the other hand its true, a word or two on a dial wont pull someone trigger to gain knowldge in watchmking world, though it would for some but n...
I happen to like
Breguet's use of the watch number on the dial, a nice little retro quirk. I don't mind a small "product line" nameplate, like the "ingenieur" at 6'oclock on the IWC or the "Delphis" on the Chronoswiss, nor a small indication, like the "Return a vol" on th...
I'm definitely not against the NAME of the watch on the dial
good point! I love the Ingenieur logo on the dial--I remember one old review of the original Inge--and it said that the name Ingenieur on the dial gave the watch its 'joie de vivre' and I could not agree more. I am 'mixed' on putting a number on the dial-...
A time and a place...
...my own preference is dial as plain as possible. I like large areas of simple colour, broken up by centre seconds, or the motion of hands. However this can lead to very formal ridge designs. How to add variety? The purist way is probably with a complica...