kjkt3
4473
However, it occurs to me that the CASE may be suspect! V&C and AP produced the same watch with the same ultra-thin movement -
calibre 1003 and 2003 respectively - and certainly shared at least one case design. Five sides of yours look correct. The crown side does not. Perhaps the photographs are misleading, but the case looks 'wrong'. Very.
Hmm, difficult to say.
By: Walter2 : November 24th, 2018-06:22
First, the watch case is in a very good unpolished condition with some oxydation, this is normal. So the watch is a safe queen. Second, it is nearly imposibel to find this dial after 70 years without spots. So i think it is restored. The "S" also is not n...
a dial refinish
By: anon438 : December 29th, 2018-03:10
I guess the dial is at least a refinish, the 'S' in deed looks very strange. But the case of the watch looks sharp and nice. With no look to the inside, anyway you shouldn't buy. If this is a ref 6290, see case back, it probably come along with cal 1003. ...
or a 'official' factory misprint
By: anon438 : December 30th, 2018-09:00
When you look a little further to the other 60's square ref's of V&C, like the ref 6290, 6702, 6908, 6559, 6787, 6919, 7297, then it might occur, you came across similar 'misprints' of the 'S'. Which naturally raises the question to me, if such an err...
the V&C 1960 square ref's ref 6290, 6702, 6908, 6559, 6787, 6919, 7297
By: anon438 : December 31st, 2018-08:48
ref 6702, cal. 1003, ~ 25 x 25 mm ref 6290, cal. 1003, ~ 26 x 26 mm ref 6908, incl. bracelet, cal. 1003, ~ 26 x 26 mm ref 6559, cal. K1001, ~ 26,5 x 26,5 mm ref 6787, cal. K1001, ~27 x 27 mm ref 6919, cal. K1001, ~28 x 28 mm ref 7297, cal. K1001/2, ~28 x ...