... it must a cutulral thing. Those designations must be certain benchmark to measure something. I concur that it must or may depend on where you are. I worked in US for 15 years until last year, had spent before that 2-year vacation at graduate school, and I know how useless it is in the real business world. But I admit that it MAY mean something to SOME people or company. CFA must be really something (I have never thought about it, so I have no idea), and I DO respect those who passed the three stages - but all I could think was that I was sorry that they had to endure such a long road of stress and that s/he must have a good memory.
Don't get me wrong about my comments on CFA or MBA. I am already in a senior management position of a big financial institution, but there are many or almost all senior management position do not have those designation - there are many other ways to climb the corporate ladder, I guess. In big US companies, those designation may be very important, but as a business counterpart, I couldn't care less - as long as s/he can close the deal and show the result. While I agree with you, Ed, about the value of CFA or MBA in US, my point is, again, that I couldn't care less whether the business counterpart has it or not. I guess the sense of value is not universal. I agree that it really depends. We may have to agree to disagree here
Apologies to the OP that I got the discussion carried away....
Ken