Comments: view entire thread
I definitely like it more than the sub...
And no cyclops...it’s interesting that Rolex never made a chrono diver.
It’s a truly fantastic timepiece...
For you, what is it about it that makes it the stand above others piece? I’m thoroughly enjoying your watch a day posts for the month, thank you for sharing 👍
Thank you for your reply, excellent. The cyclops in particular is unnecessary, pretty hard to beat clean and simple.
As an aside, the cyclops on the Sky-Dweller, at least to my eyes, wrecks what otherwise is a very good looking dial....
It really is a great piece
I'm surprised Rolex didn't let this one run for a few more years. A wonderful upgrade to the also nice 16600. Perfect for those who want the ultimate 40mm dive watch with no cyclops.
Absolutely, the extra 1 mm although it seems insignificant for me makes a difference as far as fit is concerned.
I’m not sure this shot helps for comparison ...
i
fully agree, i would even take it a step further, saying, this is the best Rolex up to date. Grtz, Dom
I have an 116600 too, although I may not have posted about it before
It really is a killer and a true tool watch (Rolex’s most technically advanced). Collectibility is hard to deny given short production. Still a great value compared to the sport watch insanity afflicting the current models. ...
Could only agree with you…
A perfect size, a modern bracelet, a ceramic bezel… For me a perfect synthesis between the past and modernity. I love divers, especially those without a date because I find the dial to be more balanced without. Moreover, the presence of a date on most div...
Could only agree with you…
A perfect size, a modern bracelet, a ceramic bezel… For me a perfect synthesis between the past and modernity. I love divers, especially those without a date because I find the dial to be more balanced without. Moreover, the presence of a date on most div...
