WatchProSite|Market|Digest
WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Rolex

Hello Acw! Thank you for your comments and completely agree with you. As I explained in my post above I knew this watch came with the wrong bracelet...

 

... when I bought it as it is a reference 17013 from an Oyster Quartz TT model.
The correct one for my reference 1630 is bracelet 96673 as you well say with three gold rows.
I asumed my watch was from 1978 as per serial number 5.44x.xxx . As you know, it is in the limits of some tables that put it in 1977 while others in 1978.
I don´t feel it is a wrong case from an Oyster Quartz as it has the correct gold section embeded on the case. Also Quartz cases come with serial number and reference number engraved on the back of lugs, and my watch doesn´t have them and looks to have the original polish underneath.
Agree with you that being rare we collectors should approach them with care. I feel that in this watch the original owner had a problem with a broken original bracelet and took the road of putting a Quartz one which was the only available to him. I bought the watch knowing that the bracelet was not correct but being the model so rare I took the plunge anyway as I own three Oyster Quartz and thought this could be an interesting addition to the theme, in spite of the problem with its bracelet.
Thank you again for your kind comments and receive my best cordial regards, Abel.

  login to reply
Related Content
expand_more
163017013DatejustOysterquartz Datejust
💰1867 Marketplace Listings for Rolex›
15 Comments view entire thread 

Rolex 1530, Is it really rare?

 
By: gensiulia : October 12th, 2015-15:12
Well i really don't know, I never had the pleasure to read something about it, it never appeals me too much actually, until the wrist test! Guys, this is a cool watch, it fits nicely on the wrist, he winks to the 3700 / 5402 and it seems to be also a rare...  

Not too familiar with the Rolex 1530 Oyster

 
By: Bill : October 12th, 2015-18:48
It does appear to be a rare bird. But Maybe not so much so with collectors when looking at choices. I guess the Die Hard collector who need every model. Bill

Yes u're right

 
By: gensiulia : October 12th, 2015-22:56
I don\'t remeber exactly the references of the other guy but I think we have 2 more cases like this with quartz mov. It\'s totally new to me, it deserves more study. Ciao

Sure about the reference?

 
By: Horology411 : November 14th, 2015-00:35
To my knowledge, there were two references where an automatic was in an oysterquartz case: the 1630 Datejust in gold and steel, and the 1520 Date model in steel. I have not heard of a 1530.

It's a 1530

 
By: acw1974 : April 22nd, 2016-03:35
Rolex made a number of integrated designs during the 70's but never made a reference 1520. They did make the following: - 5100 'Texan' in solid 18K gold with a Beta 21 quartz movement from 1970-72 - with an official limited production of 1,000 pieces 1530... 

Rolex 1530 Info

 
By: acw1974 : April 19th, 2016-13:37
This is a stunning timepiece and very rare by Rolex standards. The 1530 was manufactured by Rolex for just three years from 1974 to 1977 with an estimated production of 500 to 1,500 pieces during its short production period. It was the prerequisite design... 

Pleasure!

 
By: acw1974 : April 22nd, 2016-02:36
They are very unique and not much is known about the piece so all that I have written is from research carried out over several months. They are very rare! Here's a wrist shot with my 1530 ...  

I own a 1630 which is the steel and gold version of this watch...

 
By: Subexplorer : April 20th, 2016-09:09
... Regretably, I found my example with a wrong bracelet which actually belongs to the Quartz TT model which differs from the correct one which should have a single row of gold links. There were two models: reference 1630 called "Datejust" (steel and gold...  

Also rare

 
By: acw1974 : April 22nd, 2016-04:13
But you do need to be careful when buying these rare pieces. The original bracelet that came with the 1630 has three centre rows in 14K gold with the outer links in steel and is referenced 96673. Your bracelet has two links in 18K gold and is probably ref... 

Hello Acw! Thank you for your comments and completely agree with you. As I explained in my post above I knew this watch came with the wrong bracelet...

 
By: Subexplorer : April 22nd, 2016-07:01
... when I bought it as it is a reference 17013 from an Oyster Quartz TT model. The correct one for my reference 1630 is bracelet 96673 as you well say with three gold rows. I asumed my watch was from 1978 as per serial number 5.44x.xxx . As you know, it ... 

Hi

 
By: acw1974 : April 22nd, 2016-07:32
I'm led to believe that the last serial number from 1977 was 5,430,000 so a 5.44mil serial would be very early 1978 so your piece could well have been one of the last 1630's ever made! The dial, bezel, crown, hands and crystal look perfect so I suspect th... 

Hello again Acw! Appreciate your kind comments and suggestions. Yes, I will be in the look for a correct bracelet, though ...

 
By: Subexplorer : April 22nd, 2016-07:42
... I feel it will be hard to get it! I always look for completely original examples for my collection, but sometimes like in this rare reference I bought it in spite of its drawback. Interesting your comment about serial number and year data. Thank you a...