fernando
16050
Both the Sm 300 and the SD...
are a blast from the past and at the top of construction quality and recognition. The MB is a wonderful new entity that certainly deserves a further look into - I would like to actually see one first before making a judgement but it definitely has potential. 
cheers
fernando
A match up.
The SD4000 has got to be one of the best looking modern Rolex out there. Although some may prefer the cleaner lines of the SubC ( if you can overlook the slightly thicker lugs ). What would be your choice? Whichever it is, there's no denying the powerful ...
Hey Fernando...
....right now I have three modern watches on my desire list....the Omega 300, the Rolex SD and the Montblanc WT....all gorgeous in my view.
Both the Sm 300 and the SD...
are a blast from the past and at the top of construction quality and recognition. The MB is a wonderful new entity that certainly deserves a further look into - I would like to actually see one first before making a judgement but it definitely has potenti...
Aaaah, Fernando...
Have a look here: But I do agree, you have to see it in the flesh. Best, my friend. Nicolas
An excellent and comprehensive review Nicolas!
But at this moment, my heart has been stolen by one particular WT and I think you know which one. ;) Hint: It isn't the Tissot. :) Best fernando
You can get both of them...
There are quite a few who are considering adding this WT to the Patek... ;) Best, Vlad.
The Submariner has a big advantage on the SD, at 3 o clock. :)))
But I think the SD will be more popular. Best, Nicolas
For you only :) :)
It's very discreet here though. :) In general I think the sub is more popular and far outsells the SD, in part due to the price differential. Cheers fernando
For me SD
Both Submariner and SD are overkills for scuba diving. But if I would like to look like a professional diver, I would wear SD. That watch looks much more balanced. On the other hand, I'm just a Divemaster meaning that I do not really need a professional d...
The furthest it will go for me...
is to the bottom of the pool. :) I agree the SD is better balance and more coherent as a whole and in fact also wears a tad smaller than the sub IMO. The only disadvantage I can think of is the relative thickness compared to the Sub. However, this is miti...
Even with the date window...
And me being a Sub guy, the SD reigns supreme in this match up, Fernando. I am simply gaga over it! One of my favorite Rolex in the current lineup. Great pair, btw! Enjoy them to the fullest! All the best, Alex
I can understand that Alex.
If I'm forced to choose only one, I'll probably go with the SD too. Thanks for the kind words my friend. :) Best fernando
It's the case boys...
I owned a 10 year old SD and wanted something new. I've been a Rolex fan since the days of Mike Nelson on "Seahunt" and over the years have owned quite a few Rolex watches. I am disappointed in the redesign of the case and find the "oversized" lugs to be ...
Sea Dweller
fernando, I prefer the new Sea Dweller to the Submariner, mostly because of the lugs. Regarding the date window, I marginally prefer the clean look of the no-date Sub but, again, would go with the Dweller since the date can be handy and is unobtrusive wit...
There's hardly a noticeable difference on the wrist.
I favour the SD slightly for it's overall appearance and composure. :)