i_am_Sam
2841
A Simple Pleasure...
Just a simple 1500 Oyster Date from 1960 that always put a smile on my face whenever I had it on my wrist.
With a Glossy Gilt Swiss Only Dial, Dauphine Hands, Sharp Case and Bezel.
Just a simple yet satisfying one
Sam
Vintage
Explore the vintage 1971 Rolex Oyster Perpetual Date Ref. 1500 with its rare blue 'Long Index' dial and caliber 1570. A collector's review and community insights.
23 replies1223 views
Vintage
Explore Rolex Submariner 5508 and GMT-Master 6542 'exclamation dot' dials. A rare vintage Rolex comparison and debate on radium-tritium transition.
19 replies7693 views
Review
Detailed review of the Tudor Prince Date Hydronaut, covering its 41mm case, dial, bezel, and bracelet. Discover its unique design and Rolex heritage.
3 replies16167 views
Vintage
Uncover the true history of the Rolex Explorer I, debunking myths about its Everest connection. DrStrong details early references, movements, and design evolution.
37 replies31656 views
Vintage
Explore the Rolex Submariner Ref. 5512, focusing on the rare 4-line gilt chapter ring and Pointed Crown Guard (PCG) variants. A must-read for vintage Rolex collectors.
43 replies29320 views
A Simple Pleasure...
Just a simple 1500 Oyster Date from 1960 that always put a smile on my face whenever I had it on my wrist. With a Glossy Gilt Swiss Only Dial, Dauphine Hands, Sharp Case and Bezel. Just a simple yet satisfying one Sam ...
Absolutely! And this post most helpful to a fellow struggling with which Rolex should be my first...
For the longest while I felt the Explorer (1) was the Rolex for me. But which one—the latest iteration, with lumed 3,6,9, edged the watch away from its original versatility, I felt. And then, which movement, size, etc. But recently—last year or so—I've be...
The Explorer
to me is the perfect Rolex if I could only have one. It has great size at 36mm, clear and legible dial with iconic 3-6-9 indexes, you can either dress it up or down. But if your heart says it's the 1500, then you should follow it. Most importantly is that...
Thanks so much, Sam. Yes, the try-on is most important. The comparison of non-lumed to lumed 3,6,9 on the Explorer revealed to me the reduced versatility of the latest
reference. But I've not had a 1500 or 1501 on my wrist, so that's an obvious next step (made more complicated a the moment because of virus concerns). But all in good time. It's the journey, right? Best regards, Fred
Tough one Halgedahl.
I know here in the forum, the wind blows stronger towards the Explorer, especially the vintage ones. But for me, if you were looking for that "one" Rolex, I would go for a date-just. nothing is more Rolex than that. and the beauty of a date-just is that y...
Something on this order (2017 ref., with updated everything and killer accuracy)? It's plain (but beautiful), simple, easy to read, and bomb-proof. Can't miss. This your point?
I so appreciate your weighing-in! Many thanks! Fred ...
Yes... Absolutely..
Can't go wrong with a date just with that configuration. An ever classic and always be versatile! Sam
Many thanks my friend!
It's just pure pleasure of having such simple reference with rarity and condition. Sam
✅✅
I remember my first Rolex. Date just. I sat and stared at that watch for months. Never took it off. Pretty funny , now that I look back.
beautiful watch
Curious if it has a domed crystal? Mine was replaced with i think a later version... ...