Highlander65
1888
1959 is absolutely correct for 4 lines Nicolas...
Mine was from 1959 as well and was 100% correct watch as you know or might remember. Cheers,
A Rolex Submariner 6538 to be soon auctioned.
A superb dial, that's for sure. Credit picture: Phillips. Now one question: The watch is from 1959, according to Phillips, which seems to correspond with the case number. But isn't the 4 lines dial a bit later? Looking forward to reading your opinion on t...
Trying to destroy another auction house :)))))
Looks like money is number one priority with all auctioneers logical but bit sad Cheers D
Rolex 6538 2 line and 4 line ran side by side.
There was not an evolution that changed they can been seen from the same year. Bill
I agree
Yes, combination is ok, amazing watch....Later than 1959 isn't possible found 6538
1959 was a dynamic year for the Submariner!
1959 started with the last samples of the 6538 which were followed by the rare 5510, essentially a 6538 with 1530 movement. The year ended with first the square crown guard 5512 and finally the "eagle beak" crown guard 5512, a filed down variety of the sq...
1959 is absolutely correct for 4 lines Nicolas...
Mine was from 1959 as well and was 100% correct watch as you know or might remember. Cheers,
I believe...
1959 is a correct period year for 4 line "OCC"... I've seen it in other Submariner references : - 6536/1 4 line, which I believe 1959 is the last batch for the reference 6536/1 - 5512 with eagle beak crown guard, which is strictly from 1959 - and I've see...