219
3826
Very true - and good point. The difference was in
the mounting of the engine and the size/balance of the car. The engine with the Auto Union was firmly at the rear of the car and made the car very difficult to handle. The Cooper was mid-engined and 'balanced' with a low centre of gravity.
The difficulty in handling the Auto Union (which was exceptional on straight line speed) probably set Grand Prix cars back to the front engine drive for the next 20 years as most did not believe in 'putting the cart before the horse'!
Thanks
Andrew H
Historique Racing at Pau
By: 219 : May 22nd, 2011-01:53
g [The ERA overtaking the Cooper-Bristol] The other racing revolved around single seat racing from the Grand Prix racing eras that had been before: from the Bugatti’s of the 1920’s, through the Maserati’s and the Alfa’s of the 1950’s, through to the Lotus...
Oooh!
By: dxboon : May 24th, 2011-13:51
This looks dangerous! It's slick out there and the driver is all exposed! Yikes! Well, Richard is one of the leading motorsports enthusiasts amongst the horological community so I'm sure he could've driven the track even under those conditions (But, Richa...
Auto Unions and Coopers.
By: BDLJ : May 31st, 2011-18:57
The Auto Union engines were in front of the rear axle so they were mid-engined, the wayward handling was as much to do with the monstrous power and the stupid swing-axles as much as horrid weight distribution. None of which detracts from your point, which...