WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

Well now...

 

Naturally I am not privy to the internal workings of Patek service.  Nor should there be any need to be.

As a client / customer / proud Patek owner, the original 6 month turn around time did seem excessive. A lack of communication from the service center (note in my post that I initiated all contact at approximately the time they indicated) is disconcerting.  Lack of details about what the problem was / what was done to solve it / etc was surprising (and yes, I asked the pleasant and polite person on the phone).  Is it not my business to have a good idea about what was done to my watch? 

Providing PP service for the China market is indeed a tremendous challenge for the reasons you describe.  Despite my screen name, I am not in China; my manufacturing business does a lot of projects in China and I travel there frequently. However, the service was in North America. 

The word "silly" was used to mirror the OP's language.  Perhaps "annoying", or "frustrating" would have been better.  But having a watch sit in a box at the service center for 4 months (after 1 month for the initial cracking of the case and preparation of service proposal / approval, which was done in the time frame promised)...  well, as a manufacturing guy I will maintain that that is a resourcing issue.  Was that a temporary issue or a long term thing?  Have no way of knowing.  But I do know that there are ways of doing excellent work and managing customer expectations (extremely positive experience with H. Moser & Cie and one end, and Ball Watch at the other) under a variety of circumstances.

Cheers, Z


  login to reply