Hi Theodore, thanks for your reply and it is good to read you here. If we talk about visual effect´s,
we should not forget to ask about the reasons behind.
Off-topic: Maybe it´s hard to believe for anybody who is observing the watch industry today,
that there are still other reasons than improvement of business case - only.
Back to our topic: three bridges instead of one.
The prefered solution from PP was to do three bridges instead of one. Technically this was not possible.
Each bridge needs at least one screw for fixing.
But it was not possible to find enough space for the screw needed to fix the "middle" bridge. I am not a
watchmaker, but when I look at the movement layout in the picture below I can imagine the difficulties to
find a proper space for one more screw in that part of the movement.

