the meztger engine has been dead for a while, since the 997 GT3 RS.....that is the difference between porsche and PP. the latter are lazy (and greedy) in updating technology. [nt]
I am leaning towards the 5237 because of the movement used and towards the 5496 due to its Calatrava case design and the easier legibility (in my opinion) but I am not a big fan of retrograde dates. ...
For me the biggest selling point of the 5496 is the retrograde, a highly complex and unusual feature. Also I like that there is constant activity on the dial because of the sweep seconds hand. Also I like the day and month windows. I like that it is chunk...
I tried it a couple of times: The moonphase looks a bit "cheap", too blank at least. Congratulations that you can afford one of them! Good luck with your decision.
I have decided that I like the modernization of the 5327. I like the size of the case. I think the 3940 at 36mm is just too small for my 17 cm wrist. (I must have tried it in 20 times over the years). 38 mm case is the perfect size for my wrist. I have th...
Retrograde date dial is a great but it feels something 'empty' or missing around the moonphase subdial...i couldn't exactly put that in words. Best, mahesh.,
and you're right, the slim movement is great despite its age. But the Breguet numerals (that I usually really like) are a quick and dirty fix to hide the small movement (sub-dials close to the center). PP should be better than this imho.
I see them for their beauty. I really like the look of this watch. The 240 Q movement is a proven reliable workhorse. Much like the Metsker engine in a Porsche.
I somehow cannot get myself to like the retrograde date on the 5496, while the dial of the 5327 is just too busy with the way all the information is displayed. Furthermore, due to its large bezel and the shape of the case it looks much smaller than its no...