Mark in Paris[Purist]
10488
Well,
Oct 11, 2017,13:31 PM
This is indeed a point of view shared by several forumners here and it is perfectly natural that I would also appreciate new calibers.
I love this new 31-260 (used in the 5235G) and this is what I'd like to see at every level. The 215 replacement will be coming soon imho as that is another one that needs to be replaced.
On the other hand, even if we've seen the 240 for a long while (patent dated 1977), I would say that, compared to similar traditional established brands, I feel the 240 and 324 are still up-to-date (and my own feeling would say even a little more).
The brand has provided the whole new line of 29-535 based movements, the 31-260 AC, the 5175 Grandmaster Chime that I imagine required some ressources for around 7 years, the integrated 28-520 spec. used in the 5930 (dial used as a baseplate) or the 5650G Advanced Research (pushers and spiral leading to an excellent accuracy).
Hence, I would say that it would be great but my perception is that it is not that necessary or urgent today, even if there would be improvements for sure.
For some examples you gave (there is also Ulysse Nardin for the date with the Sonata, if I'm not wrong) it is not always applied to all the models in the line-up but a few. I think that lower production brands like FPJ or other indies can include them easier than a larger brand could (volumes, reliability issues etc...). But that's just my perception of it.
About the antimagnetic, yes it would be another nice improvement. The thing is that it requires some very different material (such as Silicon). I understood that, usually, the antimagnetic potential is linked with the material used and not the thickness of the case etc... Thus the Spiral needs to be protected and a material that can't be magnetized is a good choice. THe thing is that using Silicon on a larger scale is not that easy (higher manufacturing cost, resistance to shocks ...).
About the antimagnetic watches, I noticed that now all the 240 and 324 calibers from the brand have the Silicon spiral (called Spiromax), it should maybe then be much less prone to magnietism? Something that would be interesting to check because it is a feature that I don't think many other similar established brands use as much.
On the other hand, there are people who wouldn't like to have these Silicon parts in traditional watches. Not easy :p
Thanks for the input Gary, it is an interesting field to develop for brands
Best, Mark