..apologies if I miscontrued what you meant. I understand cars as you say for the performance analagy, I do not understand your coverting a PP just becuase It is a PP, usually there has to be something to back up what it is you particularly like...It never really has been a 'brand' that I have wanted to aspire too, like the cars I tend to lean towards technical or performance characteristics to feul my passion. Richard Mille watches, love them or loathe them, personally I love them, carbon baseplates, alusic material etc etc I really do buy into that brand due to the ethos of the RM brand. Obviously looks are very important, and I do agree the PP is a cracking looking timepiece, almost ageless and extremley nicely balanced.
My recent choice was to find a Perpetual chrono....ended up with two choices for me...I have never started out wanting to own a piece from a certain brand, then pick from wihin that brand, it always starts with a particular want , then i cast the net and see which one I think is overall the best for me for that particular need, could be a sports watch, a tourbillion, chrono, divers watch, whatever .
Then other times I just see something and fall in love with it, regardless of anything else
Thea really surprising thing in this thread to me is that there hasnt been a substantive reason for picking the Patek...I really expected a lot more substance behind the PP arguement