WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

investment

 

Investment isnt the driver, basically I have a few other watches & just wanted a perpetual chrono to keep, like many people who like watches  i suspect the fascination of a perpetual calender ticking away is something of a great addition, must have something to do with time itself, the joy of not having to alter the date in my generation...it has a sort of special meaning for some reason I find hard to express.

I understand what you say about no of parts & jewels having no bearing, as I said I do not know enough about the movements to be able to comment on the quality of one vs the other, and certainly it seems in the thread no one has come up with a 'this one is better than that one becasue....' so I would conclude they are of similar quality.

Is the Patek valued so highly just becasue it is a Patek?...if the ALS had the PP movement & vice versa, would the Patek camp be singing its praises over the ALS due to its presumably more complicated nature, due to it having more parts etc?

I ask these questions not to offend or upset anyone in either camp, I am really just trying to understand the differances, and the reasons for them to assist in my choice, I am fascinated by both watches. And yes people will say 'buy the one that shouts out to you the most' fair comment, I always do..problem here they are both shouting so loudly and equally that I have been trying to give the edge to the one that gives the best value for what it is without taking into account the name or branding...its a toughy!

  login to reply