jgarcia570
71
pp sans geneva seal
hi, do you guys think that this move from pp would affect the perception of quality of pp watches. after all the geneva seal is a separate entity that impects the pp watches. ity seems to me that then anybody( omega cartier vacheron rolex) could have their own seal. thanks jorge
My response
By: patrick_y : March 20th, 2009-01:07
1. I am very sorry to see Patek leave the Geneva Seal of which it has been the superstar receiver of said Seal for so many years. I think the Geneva Seal is a good indication of solid quality, detailed finishing, and is the benchmark of fine movements. I ...
I would not...
By: mac_omega : March 20th, 2009-01:10
Hello Patrick, I would not worry about the absence of the Geneva seals on any of my Pateks at all! As you might have realized there are lots of vintage Pateks without the Geneva seal and they obtain highest prices as well. Every watch collector knows that...
I don't care
By: Bruno.M1 : March 20th, 2009-02:02
the geneva seal is ofcourse more important than a cosc certificate. But on the other hand I think they're more a marketing gimmick But If PP says they have even higher standards I do believe them. We don't need a extra seal, we already know enough when Pa...
I would not compare
By: Dje : March 20th, 2009-04:50
Hi, I understand Patek Philippe's current position towards the Geneva seal. If they think the Seal is not stringent enough for today's market and for their watches, they are right to go beyond and definitely entitled to do so. Still I honestly don't think...