joenghenry
4053
Personally I like 5970 a bit more due to its contemporary size.
However, 3970 is nothing less than a grail PP if you likes its more vintage size.
My preference is the 5970
By: yming : February 4th, 2025-15:04
The case design with the flared lugs elevates the watch and despite being 40mm, it’s wears closer to a 38.5mm because of the bezel and lugs design.. plus the larger diameter balances out the height nicely.. finally the tachymeter makes the look more sport...
3970 is the original…
By: lascases : February 4th, 2025-17:44
…and 5970 just a later copy with a larger case. The 5970 case is also too large for the dial (they needed to expand it to fit the larger case). The 5970 case is also too big for the 3970 caliber. A preference of some for a larger watch taken aside - the 3...
By: chris19049 : February 4th, 2025-20:39
Both are beautiful watches. For me, I went with the 5970 because of the rectangular pushers, the overall size and the balance of the dial. To me, it has a very classic look. Honestly... is there a wrong decision?
I agree with you..
By: yming : November 8th, 2025-13:49
There is something special abt the case.. it’s rather strong and sporty.. the 3970 and 5970 abt both thick watches ~ 13mm.. the 40mm case balances it out perfectly.. the only complain I have is the date ring eats into the minute track.. setting the time t...
Having owned the 3970
By: cmclee : November 9th, 2025-10:28
I think if I have the choice, I would pick the 5970. The reason is that the 3970 size feels small for my wrist, and the 5970 fits much better. However, I own the 5270g, and here's a pic of it beside the 5970j. Both have their merits. ...