whit
558
Not quite 300 years, more like 171 years but still a long
time.
Creativity? Don't think I would agree on that point.
Independent? Yes.
Going strong financially? Absolutely...for now.
I do believe it is very clear the past twenty-five years has been very kind to Patek, not only financially but the awareness and demand of the product, which has pushed them to levels which they have never experienced. This has come with some baggage, QC problems, applications to buy certain pieces, ability to change dials and hands....restrictions. Now it seems they are evolving to a more mass produced "high-end" watch which may open the door for another firm to fill the gap that Patek has chosen to abandon. It's happened with automobiles and, watches are no different.
When money is involved and when we are talking about the type of money that Patek has captured recently, being able to adapt and maintain all the "expected" inherent qualities and services of quieter times is an incredible challenge that I would dare say, not many firms (not just watchmaking or automotive) have been successful.
The car/watch associations are interesting but when I saw them, I realized that my relationships of the two products was influenced by historical reputation and maybe really good marketing. My personal experiences show quite a different mix of associations from those posted. Maybe a different thought would be, if you had to choose just one watch and one car that you had absolute confidence regarding reliability over all others. What would they be?
Watch VS Car
By: robertshaos : August 7th, 2010-01:43
IMO I would say.... Patek=Ferrari Audemars Piguet=Lamborghini A.Lange & Sohne=Porsche Rolex=Mercedes-Benz Panerai=BMW This week I have visited 3 Patek AD's, the interest thing was a Patek sales person always mention or says owning a Patek is like owning a...
Poor AD!
By: Le Chef : August 7th, 2010-08:06
It shows a distinct lack of knowledge about the car market. Patek is more like Rolls Royce for it's use of modern technology, hand construction and traditional materials. Lange is more like Bristol - very traditional but with really high tech materials in...
Interesting comparisons
By: docsnov : August 7th, 2010-10:15
I am like the Count, in that I am not that into cars. For me a car is something to get me where I need to go, purely functional. I grew up with a father who always had car magazines around ( a Jaguar enthusiast ), and I never understood the interest. I th...
Patek vs. Car
By: Highlander65 : August 8th, 2010-04:01
For me--I drive an Audi S 5 Cab and my sports car is a Porsche 1996 993 Turbo--last of the hand made air cooled turbos--with only 10k miles on it! For me I wear a 5960P and 5146P and having owned a Ferrari in the past would never buy one again! Anyone who...
humbly disagree
By: Hororgasm : August 8th, 2010-15:19
i think Pateks are more mercedes-like, but more like in this "order" calatravas and gondolos- C class aquanauts - SLK nautilus - CLKs annual calenders - E class travel watches - M class perpetual calenders - CLS chronographs - S class tourbillons - SL cel...
I don't think so
By: eric.vonschonberg : August 7th, 2010-14:25
That's completely incongruous to associate a Patek with a Ferrari. Patek is conservative, high quality, and expensive which just screams Rolls Royce. Richard Mille is not conservative, exotic, and expensive, which just screams Ferrari. I'd say: Richard Mi...
VERY right ! ...
By: COUNT DE MONET : August 10th, 2010-05:16
... what you are saying regarding PP : as I mentioned in my answer here: an AD has the impression as if PP will be the next Rolex. Also right about the QC issues: I have seen, quite a few, PP watches with impairment at various ADs: marks on the dial, NOT ...
In general terms...
By: RJW : August 7th, 2010-19:46
Members of the general public are much more familiar with cars than watches. So I guess it makes some sense, as a starting point, for a salesman to equate watch brands (many of which are unknown to much of the public) to car brands, even if only to accoun...