Comments:
The problem would be a obtaining a Pepsi dial at list within the next three years
I am not a Rolex man at all but for the first time ever, they have a chance to convert me to buy a Rolex but I guess they have such a huge clientele, they do not really need another convert! 
You think you need three years to get the Pepsi Steel? Really? Wow... One year, it makes sense, but three years? [nt]
No message body
I can only dream of one year Nico
In Malaysia, they are refusing to even put me on the list unless I buy another watch of a superior value. In the UK, they are not even taking names so I have no idea how I am ever going to get one even in 3 years time but I am more patient than most so I will wait. People normally like the latest product and hopefully the craze will die down by 2020.
Well, it is often the case with " new " Rolexes, but after a while it calms down. The Milgauss Green Glass, for example. Tough to get the first 18 months, then, quite easy to find. [nt]
No message body
reassuring words Nico
Mind you the steel Daytona is still a tough one to get and always will be I guess.
The steel Daytona is another story, indeed. It has always been a different story. [nt]
No message body
Tudor GMT for me: to my taste, it design seems more "fresh" than the Rolex, despite its vintage look (and I really like the riveted steel bracelet!).
For myself the main no-go for Rolex is the bezel: too much wide and shiny with a quite fat font for numbers. Apart that, 2 great watches, one from a surprising brand, the other... less surprising.
Best,
massi
Rolex for me. No contest
I'm not a huge fan of the faux vintage genre. Tribute piece, if done faithfully, is sometimes another story.
Tudor for me
Hi
Prefer the more subdued bezel of Tudor & as I'm not a fan of bracelets again that is another plus.
Still not wholly enthusiastic about crown tube on the Tudor, prefer the crown guards of the Rolex.
On balance it's still the Tudor though
Cheers
JML
Prefer the more subdued bezel of Tudor & as I'm not a fan of bracelets again that is another plus.
Still not wholly enthusiastic about crown tube on the Tudor, prefer the crown guards of the Rolex.
On balance it's still the Tudor though
Cheers
JML
Tudor for me
Prefer the Rolex hands but the whole watch has become too bling for me especially with the jubilee strap. Tudor case a bit thick. Looking forward to seeing the Tudor 58 in the flesh with the slimmer case.
6 - 10 for the Rolex. Agreed on the crown tube. Something I am really fan of... [nt]
No message body
I take the Rolex
When Tudor are trying to be Tudor, I think it works really well. But when Tudor are trying to be Rolex, it fails.
Like the old saying...when Lion and Lamb go for dinner, only one brings the mint sauce.
Like the old saying...when Lion and Lamb go for dinner, only one brings the mint sauce.
I don't know if it fails. A GMT ala Tudor, with some obvious key elements from the 6542. A fiction. But I get your point, and one more vote for the Rolex: 7 - 11 for Rolex. [nt]
No message body
The Tudor first for me followed closely behind by the Rolex GMT Ceramic BLRO
If the competition was between the Tudor and the earlier versions of the Rolex Ceramic GMT, then the Tudor would win by a landslide.
If Tudor increased the price by 3x and make it application piece, waiting list, limited quantities, then I chose Tudor :)
If not, Rolex for me. Their quality is King.
Rgds
Raymond
My vote is counts -1 for both: the colours, the colours ...
The Rolex is not really red and the Tudor is not really blue.
But maybe in metal they look better?
But maybe in metal they look better?
Tudor
If the Rolex actually looked like the picture that you posted in real life, it would have been the winner by a mile. But as others have mentioned the bezel is actually purplish and dull, way less appealing than the old aluminum versions (or Tudor's).