WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Blancpain

Alex, thanks for your kind reply!

 
 By: small-luxury-world : May 18th, 2013-03:08
Oliver

Nice post, Oliver.

 
 By: VMM : May 18th, 2013-02:54

The blackened one on the green strap looks nice from here, kinda like it.

 

Thanks for taking the time to share it.

 

 

vte

Vte, thanks and I could imagine ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : May 18th, 2013-03:09
one of those on your wrist ... smile

Oliver

Interesting addition - looking forward to see it in metal

 
 By: nitediver : May 18th, 2013-05:42
Wearing my FF when writing this comment. I am qurious how the Bathiscope compares to the FF 5015.

And I am glad to hear that I soon can get a NATO strap that fits!

Thanks for the report, Oliver

Stefan

X-71?

 
 By: JohnPassaquar : May 20th, 2013-08:56

At 23mm between the horns will this take an X-71 as made for the FF?

Thanks

Olly

That would look strange and I doubt it...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : May 20th, 2013-09:13
as the end pieces are individually designed for each case shape (i.e. case diameter and thickness) so a 'natural fit' is highly unlikely. In addition, the shape of the lugs are totally different between the two.

Magnus
This message has been edited by Ornatus-Mundi on 2013-05-20 09:14:43

I have my doubts ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : May 20th, 2013-09:31
because the shape of the case is totally different. Also I think it won´t look good.

This is a really nice minimalist

 
 By: Aless156 : May 20th, 2013-12:37
interpretation of a dive watch. I think Blancpain did a really good job. I have to admit, until I saw this watch, none of the current FF's appealed to me and I could not see myself buying a modern FF. They all seem too far removed from the many lovely vintage models. The new Bathyscaphe, however, is so paired down it seems closer to the vintage models, at least to me it does.

I love the minimalist design of the case, bezel and dial. My only criticism is that they should have done away with the white gold surrounds for the plots and made them bigger.

Thanks for the write up.

I saw this watch for the first time recently...

 
 By: patrick_y : March 3rd, 2014-14:14
I saw this watch for the first time recently at my local Blancpain dealer.  

And I really liked it!  The design, the movement, even the movement finishing!  

This watch is great!  And I'll take mine on the green nato strap thank you very much!  

Great post, Oliver....

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : May 17th, 2013-10:28
Nice way of introducing the modern versions. I love looking back at how watch references evolve. Great article. Here is my contribution to the historical evolution...fitting....I think....to post the 50th anniversary






That one was a great one to celebrate an important anniversary.

 
 By: amanico : May 17th, 2013-14:51

Best looking FF, to me. [nt]

 
 By: VMM : May 18th, 2013-02:58
No message body

Thanks a lot, Baron! The 50th Anniversary ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : May 18th, 2013-03:15
was addictive to me as well, but at the end I never got one. Why? First, I found the price (compared to the very similar FF Trilogy) quite prohibitive. Second, I got some very good offers, but the "simple/flat" dial couldn´t convince me at the end. Still think it is a great watch, but just not for me smile

Oliver

The 60th is a nice watch

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : May 19th, 2013-02:33
If I looked at it in isolation, I would like it. I wouldn't buy it, but I would like it. However, having read what others have said in this thread, it strikes me that there is some common theme. Many people feel that Blancpain have missed a wonderful opportunity to re-issue a tribute to one of their more prestigious historical watches. I think more than dislike the 60th, per se, much negativity stems from what was NOT issued rather than what was issued. 

A nicely written article, Oliver. But I tend to disagree.

 
 By: amanico : May 17th, 2013-14:41

1/ Because the original Batyscaphe is, in my opinion, not the most interesting piece in the Vintage world, the big cases being THE FF to go for. ( 41 mm ).

2/ Because, for the 60th birthday of the Fifty Fathoms, there were more interesting watches to go for, once again, in my opinion.

3/ Because I think that, as for the original Batyscaphe, the new one lacks of charism.

Blancpain missed a good opportunity to release something really exciting. At least, this is what I feel.

Best,

Nicolas

Nicolas, thanks for your reply and your thoughts.

 
 By: small-luxury-world : May 18th, 2013-03:23
Infact we disagree, but that is ok for me. I guess when it comes to the theme Fifty Fathoms you have a kind of vintage paradigm in mind, which we don´t share.

Best,
Oliver

Well, the Vintage FFs allow me to appreciate some modern FFs, such as

 
 By: amanico : May 18th, 2013-05:24

Yours and the 50th anniversary model.

But this one, I still wonder why...

wink

*Best,

Nicolas.

+1, my friend ...

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : June 4th, 2013-06:36
... I have to admit that I was everything but impressed by the Bathyscaphe. Its highlight is certainly the movement, but I would rather spend the money on a completely different watch or continue saving for the "big" FF.

Marcus

Thanks for the article Oliver.

 
 By: foversta : May 17th, 2013-15:04
The article is much better than the watch actually.

I found it a bit uninspired. It is not ugly, I can wear it without problem... but it is so-so which is sometimes worse.

I wonder why. And I think it is because there is a slight unbalance on the design. I find the bezel too thin for the dial opening and the date location doesn't soften this feeling.

I much prefer the FF if we stay within the contemporary Blancpain.




Thanks.

Fx

FX, thanks for your reply and your thoughts ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : May 18th, 2013-03:31
even when we don´t share our view this time. For me the regular FF is a beauty and the new Bathyscaphe is (like) a tool. The latter explains the design to me and the outstanding movement is just the cream on top.

Best,
Oliver

Great write up.

 
 By: Briandumais : May 18th, 2013-06:16
I have been scratching my head wondering whey they picked this model for such an important anniversary.  i have owned a few of the original models and i found them very boring.  I would never consider this a dive watch for a re-issuie.  With such small amounts of lume on the dial i consider this more of a dress watch.  

That being said i think they have greatly improved on the original design.  I like the case size, case construction and i like the large dial to smaller bezel ration.  One think that i don't like on the updated version is the hands but i do think they are improvement on the original. 

One thing i would not call this is a budget Ff ($9000 USD).  Try  compare the Tudor Pelagos that sell about half as much as the new Bathyscaphe and tudor includes a metal band.  I think tudor really created some great watches that are affordable.  

Overall all i like what they have done to the Bathyscaphe and i  would like to see one in person.  But i really don't think i would shell out that much money.   

Brian






Nice thread....

 
 By: Fricks : May 18th, 2013-12:03
... watch looks good but there is a real deal breaker here : The date. 
is it me or is it just not right on such a dial. The location also feels so wrong.