mrsnak
4839
Yes, definitely a 565...
...I also own more than a few Omegas with the push-pull date advancement, so was surprised to hear this. We had the movement exposed and all appeared well inside. Only 2 positions - closed and time set. Will have to revisit this... This message has been edited by mrsnak on 2012-01-02 18:37:50
Need help with this Omega rerefence
Team, Got this watch and one of the reasons, besides the extreme low cost, was that it looks very "funky" and is very comfortable on the wrist. I would love to receive some advise from the experts. It's, for sure, a good example of the crazy 70's creativi...
Coincidentally, mrsnak just acquired . . .
. . . the very same reference, Nilo, which he said was produced in '69 (if memory serves correctly). Let's see if I can contact him this last working day of the year to provide some assistance . . .
Thank you ...
Art, No rush. After all this watch was promoted to the status of "eternal keeper" because my wife loved the retro style. Have a wonderful 2012. Nilo
mrsnak had a few comments . . .
. . . to share, Nilo. First, you were fortunate to get one on a bracelet because the watch "requires a special screw-down adapter for the link ends." Second, you don't need the dedicated Omega dial extractor . . . just be judicious when applying pressure....
Thanks Art and Mrsnak
I'm lucky enough that my watchmaker has the proper Omega tool. No issues there. Just a little weird. Cheers, Nilo
You did find the correct reference number...
...I went through a similar discovery process. My watchmaker informed me that the Omega crystal removal tool for this model for this has only 4 prongs, as opposed to the usual 16, but that the regular one works fine with proper tension. He used it to get ...
Thank you. The great thing about Omega watches is ...
That is very simple, in many cases, to source parts. In this case my watchmaker replaced the crystal with a NOS one. Cheers, Nilo
Your describing the quick set of the 565 !,,
Hi Congrats on a classic 70s Omega with a killer 565 movement! Looks like you found the correct reference . Happy new year! Bill Sohne
Thank you Bill ...
Do you have a better way to describe this quick set process? Cheers, Nilo Note: There was some issue with the forum that prevented my response to show. I believe that is fixed. This message has been edited by nilomis on 2012-01-02 04:08:27
Unless I am missing something...
...our watches do not have a 'quickset' date function. The fastest way to advance the date is to turn the minute hand to about the 3AM position, then back to about the 9PM, then back to the 3AM, repeating until you arrive at the date you want.
hmm--- the 565 dos have quick set... Mr. Snak.
Hi Did your watchmaker confirm you have a 565 caliber movement inside ? The 565 has a quick set by pulling the crown out to the second position and then push it back in to advance the date... its a "pull n' push " action to advance the date. Good Hunting ...
Yes, definitely a 565...
...I also own more than a few Omegas with the push-pull date advancement, so was surprised to hear this. We had the movement exposed and all appeared well inside. Will have to revisit this...
It's a 565 ...
And you can quick set using the "pump" of the crown. Image from the Internet Old-Omegas. It's clumsy but works. Cheers, Nilo...
Thanks nilomis and Bill
Not thrilled to learn that my Geneve probably has a damaged quickset part, but good to know it's how that particular movement should function correctly. Nice to post that chart for everyone to see. BTW- Those date quicksets are awkward enough, but when yo...
über funky! :)
Very nice - looks super funky! Congrats, Nilo! Sorry I have no info on this one... Best Blomman
You are correct ...
But even with all this "funkiness" it dresses very well and is a pleasure to wear, even with the square (39mm) case. Cheers, Nilo