Skip
12
SEAMASTER CAL. 333
SEAMASTER CAL. 333
I have never posted before but have read many blogs about Omegas. Recently I acquired a Seamaster cal. 333. In trying to determine if the watch was authentic, I could find very little about the 333 in a Seamaster. The Omega’s vintage web site does not list the 333, only the 332 no regulator, and 30.10 RA T1 RG. with special regulator. I know of only one other 333 Seamaster and like my watch has (Omega Seamaster Automatic) only, and no Chronometer printed on the dial both have case numbers of 2515-2. I thought that the dial was a redial. The only true way to determine if a dial has been redone is to remove it from the watch and examine the dial marker tabs. The original dial will still have the splayed out ends where the tabs have been riveted with a punch. My watch has the original riveted tabs with no glue or solder. Also, I had never seen the font used on my Seamaster 333 until I read the post by diamondjim about the Seamaster cal 343. It appears that MSNWatch has the identical font on his Seamaster 343. Both of these Seamasters have the RG special regulator and no Chronometer printed on the dial. I know that Omega did a lot of things that we don’t know about. It appears to me that they did produce Chronometer grade watches in Chronometer grade cases with Seamaster on the dial and WITH OUT CHRONOMETER printed on the dial. I will try to aid two pictures, one of my watch and the other is from a friend, both are Seamasters with the 333 movement and RG regulators.
333

Lifestyle
cazalea · Feb 6, 2025
Cazalea shares his Walks with Watches series, reflecting on weather and timekeeping. Explore his collection and adventures, including an early Bell & Ross.
8 replies1117840 views

Community
cazalea · Jan 16, 2021
Cazalea's '77 Walks With Seikos' summary: a unique project blending watch collecting with outdoor exploration. Revisit the journey.
15 replies254617 views

Review
amanico · Jun 19, 2016
Amanico's hands-on review of the JLC Tribute To Deep Sea Alarm. Explore its history, unique alarm complication, and comparison to vintage diver watches.
262 replies211264 views

Vintage
amanico · Oct 14, 2009
In-depth review of the Rolex Explorer II Ref. 1655 'Freccione' by amanico, exploring its history, design, and market evolution. Essential reading for collectors.
123 replies153022 views

Reference Guide
amanico · Nov 3, 2018
Explore Jaeger-LeCoultre's diving watch history, from the rare Memovox Deep Sea Alarm to the iconic Polaris. An in-depth guide on JLC's dive watch legacy.
111 replies82413 views

Vintage
KIH · Aug 18, 2025
Uncover the true history of the Omega Speedmaster and its NASA connection. KIH's article features Omega Museum Manager Petros Protopapas, challenging common myths.
101 replies69789 views
SEAMASTER CAL. 333
By: Skip : April 30th, 2009-13:59
SEAMASTER CAL. 333 I have never posted before but have read many blogs about Omegas. Recently I acquired a Seamaster cal. 333. In trying to determine if the watch was authentic, I could find very little about the 333 in a Seamaster. The Omega’s vintage we...
Nice one
By: MSNWatch : April 30th, 2009-14:56
Watch has correct case and movement - the cal. 333 was used in case reference 2515 - the stainless steel version of the large centenary case (ref. 2500 which also used cal. 333). The dial on your watch is a refinished one.
New concept: reprint
By: Skip : April 30th, 2009-15:12
New concept: reprint Sorry, I do not understand reprint of a dial. Please explain this process without doing a complete redial. Both watches are 2515-2 Seamasters. The larger picture is of my watch. It has not been redialed. The font is the same as your d...
It's a redial...
By: MSNWatch : April 30th, 2009-16:34
I don't think the cal. 333 came with a dial marked "seamaster" - Bill, correct me if I'm mistaken. I saw your watch at auction and for the price it went for, it was a good deal even considering the fact that the it is a redial. The movement was used in th...
Hi Skip ...
By: Bill Sohne : April 30th, 2009-21:16
Hi Skip Welcome to the forum !! I just posted a article on the 352 Seamasters... I have to agree with Mike the 2515 case ref is a non water resistant snap back case. For a watch to be a Seamaster it would have to have either a screwback gasketed case or a...
The Ref 2515...
By: mac_omega : May 1st, 2009-08:40
Hi Skip, The Ref. 2515 is no Seamaster, it is not waterproof either... plain snap back without O-ring gasket. I also own a Ref 2515 chronometer in SS and there is no "Seamaster" on the dial. My dial is quite patinated - so I assume it is original and neve...