rolexprince
24
Omega Constellation Cal 505
I had this Omega Constellation for the past 17 years and would like to learn more about Omega Constellations in particular.
When was the Constellation first produced? Would appreciate your comments and advise. Thank you. HamL.
New Release
Explore the Patek Philippe Ref. 5208 triple complication from Baselworld 2011, featuring a minute repeater, monopusher chronograph, and instantaneous perpetual calendar.
34 replies66555 views
Review
Explore a collector's 'on-the-wrist' review of the Omega Aqua Terra Teck Annual Calendar. Discover insights on its design, wearability, and Caliber 8601 performance.
61 replies39489 views
Reference Guide
Bill Sohne explores the Omega Seamaster Caliber 352, detailing its lineage and technical evolution. A must-read for vintage Omega collectors.
33 replies38590 views
Vintage
Hans_jorgen_1968 reviews his 1972 Omega Dynamic Genève / Dynamic I, discussing its elliptical design, Caliber 752, and personal history.
7 replies37941 views
Discussion
Explore the unprecedented Omega X Swatch MoonSwatch collaboration. patrick_y and the community debate its impact on Omega's luxury brand image and existing Speedmaster owners.
138 replies29763 views
Vintage
In-depth review of the Omega Seamaster 300 reference 165.024. Explore its vintage features, case details, movement, and historical significance as an iconic diver.
41 replies26215 views
Omega Constellation Cal 505
I had this Omega Constellation for the past 17 years and would like to learn more about Omega Constellations in particular. When was the Constellation first produced? Would appreciate your comments and advise. Thank you. HamL....
What case reference is that?
The first Constellations came out in the early 1950's. They were Globemasters in the US for a couple years because of some kind of trademark issue, and switched to Constellation like everywhere else in 1954. You can learn just about all you need to know i...
Case ref 2852 Constellation Cal 505
I bought the watch as is, without any referbishment to any part of the watch. Keeps good time and is ideal for my wrist of 6.5 inches. Thanks. Ham L
the font/spelling is incorrect but i say 'enjoy it'
the dials obviously been refinished, but getting it refinished again (as i did) is very difficult for a dial like that so i'd wear it and enjoy it. it looks great and when you wear it out you'll be the only one to know its not totally original. welcome to...
Many thanks, Ralph & Graham.
I can only see the difference when I have another similar Omega to compare with. Cheers. Ham L.
Around here....
..... there seems to be at least one member with a correct original version of just about every vintage Omega to use as a comparison. What immediately caught my attention was the last "n" in Constellation - it didn't roll under. At least most Connies had ...
me ? ;)
I have 3 2852 de Luxe and I think Mike has some, too. Here's my rosegold 2852 de Luxe. Best. Hoi....
Thanks , Hoipolloi.
I bought this Constellation from Australia. I read your post on Constellation "dials from Australia" which has Chronometer instead of Chronometre, similar to that of mine. They can do 'wonders' even with gold dial watch. ( I am learning) I have a smaller ...
Not much that I can do
Hi. I don't think that I can help you much here but our watch looks correct and original to me. I have one like that, 32mm in diameter, powered by a cal 500 and cased in the US with a snap back (yours in the UK, right ?) These watches do not belong to any...
Thank you Hoipolloi
I am quite sure that your Constellation is the correct one., after having viewed other Constellations. Warmest regards . Ham L.