myles721
1263
Apollo 8 right?
It always confuses me the exact criteria for “PROFESSIONAL”...It also strikes me as odd that my Speedmaster OTM’s are not labeled pro when my PO CHRONO with the very same 9300 IS..perplexing.🤔
It's Tuesday again. What are you wearing? 🤪
Still waiting for the Snoopy 3 so wearing the Apollo 8 DSOTM 😁 ...
Apollo 8 right?
It always confuses me the exact criteria for “PROFESSIONAL”...It also strikes me as odd that my Speedmaster OTM’s are not labeled pro when my PO CHRONO with the very same 9300 IS..perplexing.🤔
I think the "professional" designation has more to do with active service or having been certified by either Omega or another group to pass certain rigorous tests...
The ceramic Speedies probably would not pass these same tests as ceramic could and would shatter on impact with other hard materials hence why most "professional" classed watches from any manufacturer are made of SS, Ti, or any other metal and composites....
Didn’t know that the 8 was...
Technically a DSOTM...having said that the deep black ceramic IS labeled pro...yes 🤷🏼🤷🏼🤷🏼
Life is a...
...old chum... (sorry, couldn't resist) Meanwhile, what a fun Speedie! ...
My most worn watch of 2020 and heading to be the same in 2021
Hi all, Whilst it may be my only Speedmaster it is the watch that is worn the most by me and the one that still grabs my attention every time I put it on my wrist. Marc ...
tap for video
Mon pays ce n’est pays un pays, c’est l’hiver Mon pays ce n’est pas un pays, c’est l’hiver
Still wearing . . .
. . . the unicorn. To date, this is the only ref CO2494 I've seen with a cal 352 chronometer movement. (Tony C has a C K 2494 powered by a later cal 354.) For illustration, I've seen three other Tiffany-signed ref 2364 chronometers other than mine. And th...
