amanico
[JLC Moderator]
277209
Yes, you are right, me too. PAM 36 / 40 for me along with 202/A and 201/A. Then, Pre V Mare smooth bezel. Then, 372, 587 / 662 / 249.
No message body
Blast from the Past: Panerai Luminor Marina PAM 1.
A classic. An evocation of some great souvenirs. Best, Nicolas ...
I have to be honest with you....
..Nico (as always). I place the 001, at the bottom of the "early ones" list. The missing 9 on the dial, took long to get used to, for me at least
I will join the hunt
Been reading up on the pre-vendome to early vendome pieces to understand the DNA of a pure Panerai. Did you see the new platinum luminor with a green dial? What are your thoughts about this Sergio? Here is a shot of PAM36/40 from someone we know. Nico’s p...
Much as I love the...36
for it's tobacco dial and the 4 lines, I've never had any feeling whatsoever for the 40. Had the chance to buy it, a couple of times, but just wasn't interested. To me, the 40, it's just the titanium version of the 001 (sorry Nico). I've just had a look a...
I have been part of...
the discussion all along, I'm sure. I think I've been around for more than 15 years..haha I am aware of the aura and mistique of the 40 BUT, for me, it still looks like a titanium's 001 :P lollllll
The best pams are the simpler ones, not the moon phase-split chrono GMTs... but this is still pure enough for me.. besides their small seconds is unique and slick. Not a perfectly balanced
dial but maybe that's a nice counterpart (or option) to perfect symmetry.
