A lot of patience and planing to capture in fullest. When you get the fine details from the dial, you also get reflexes from the polished bezel and lugs. The opposite is also true. No reflexes ... no detail from the dial. Cheers, Nilo
Given that a fair portion of all exciting watches ends up in the ownership of members here and that I have seen Geophysics of all types here already I was wondering what the opinions on the modern versions are - specifically the Tribute to 1958 in SS and ...
The Cal 898 / A ( from memory ) for the TT Geophysic, the Cal 770 for the True Second. One finely tuned, the 898/A, the other with a dead second. One which is a Tribute, the other which is a fiction. One with a Date the other without. One which is below 4...
I like the UT very much but find it\'s a very different watch. When you say the 898A is very finely regulated - so more exact timekeeping then? And the anti-magnetic properties? Or not really? Thanks for your input, Nico - final question: if you had to ch...
I've come around to appreciate the true second movement, and I think it is a nice innovation by JLC; and the gold rotor is an excellent addition. Regarding the TT Geophysic, I needed it to have a bit more oomph (technical term!) from a movement perspectiv...
Agree with you on the size and the charm of the original; still the TS is hardly massive in its own right - JLC judged it nicely IMHO. A hand wound movement would be interesting but not sure it would make sense commercially at that price level, since many...
Both 38.5 and 39.5 mm are good sizes. Manual wind on the TT Geo would have been great and would easily have sold out. For a regular production run like the True Second, I understand the overall appeal of an automatic movement (but I won\'t be swayed over ...
I guess the UT has the complication without having the date A Purist was nice enough to let me handle his and it is really very, very appealing. I guess the last years have been great for world timers...
Been spending a lot of time wrapping my head around this topic… On one hand, I love the idea. On the other hand, I am not thrilled by the execution. But as I have an intimate relationship with the original Geophysic, I am biased… Now, a couple of years af...
And I am already looking forward to reading your in depth take on the subject Would your opinion on the hands and dial of the TS change, if it was a Tribute to Geomatic? So a vote for platinum, then. Apart from the fact that they are almost impossible to ...
I got the SS version as soon was released and ... I had mixed feelings about it (no wrist presence was my main issue) and I let it go. Then the true seconds was released ... Same feeling as the SS version. No deal for me. At that time, I was fully against...
A lot of patience and planing to capture in fullest. When you get the fine details from the dial, you also get reflexes from the polished bezel and lugs. The opposite is also true. No reflexes ... no detail from the dial. Cheers, Nilo
I have been walking by this one and am very close to pulling the trigger, except for the fact that I once owned it and let it go because the PL was just so much better. And yet I miss it everyday. The crosshairs make it such a unique piece, but it is on t...
JLC PT Geophysic JLC PT Polaris Omega Seamster 300M, new retro version (41mm) Weiss Watch On the list: JLC Deepsea Cermet JLC Deepsea Vintage (debatable since it looks a lot like the SM 300m) Blancpain Bathyscaphe (debatable) And I have to be honest I rea...
It is hard to describe why I like it so much. The weight is wonderful first off. The shine of the hour markers is just so perfectly subtle, like it is almost talking to you when asking for the time, calling like a shiny object at the bottom of the ocean f...
The platinum geophysic for me is a transformative experience each time I put it on. It gives me great confidence that I have control over fate, that I feel like El Capitan. Perhaps the strong evocation of feelings are what I look for in a watch. The Polar...
Now that\'s the second vote for the platinum. Is it primarily the dial or the heft and feel of the material (and of course the more limited nature) that made the difference for you?
The dial of the PT looks bigger since the second markers are not on the perimeter. And the heft is unmistakable. When I owned both, the SS felt weaker, but it is a different watch and perhaps shouldn\'t be compared this way. The SS is wonderful and any se...
I also replaced the stock bracelet with a navy one, same kind and everything (but from CF), changed the buckle for a folding one, and I think it really adds something to the watch. It\'s only afterwards that i noticed that the Pr version came with a navy ...
Or is this as far as it will go variation wise? I do like the True Seconds but I am reluctant to go for it just yet as I think they may not be done experimenting with the Geophysic line yet and may have some interesting creations coming in the new year......
That the Geophysic line would evolve, I was wondering ever since what would happen. A GMT, chronograph, etc., I was even hoping to see potential dial colour variations (albeit diverting quite a bit from the original inspiration) on the True Seconds, I thi...
as I was with my better half looking at the reverso (for her), we had a chit-chat with the JLC/Printemps booth representative, about geophysics, and he eventually told us about an upcoming geophysic watch, with a tourbillon. It sounded weird at that time,...
Both!!! Quick snapshots I took on my desk on Sep 30 last year when I picked up the new one. The TTG is an amazing, carefully adapted tribute watch (many thanks again Nicholas for your involvement and to push it through!) and the new True Beat is looking f...
Namely both. I can definitely see your point and the two are indeed different and complementary. Which one gets more wrist time from you? Thanks for your input Ambos!
.. a pragmatic decison. When the TT Geophysics 1958 came, I chose the ss/ Crosshair one: clear lines, a nice contemporary size ( yes, my friend Blomman), and otherwise a rather cool 3-hand, and my crush on crosshairs - I don\'t mind the "faux patination" ...
Only a lume shot of the TTG There\'s a lot of pro\'s and con\'s for \'fake patina\' but one can also just see it as another colour... And if I\'m not mistaken, today\'s super luminova doesn\'t really \'age\' anymore (the days of radioactive Tritium are go...
I acquired a TT 1931 Reverso in 2012. I think I would have bought the Geophysic 1958 in 2014 except that when it was announced I had just bought an AP 15202 which meant that a new watch was off limits for a year or two. By the time I had Mrs T's permissio...
I know it is too easy to do so, but if you will share your experiences with the watch at some point that would be excellent. So a(nother) vote for the SS TT after all!