Watch Connoisseur
62
Jaeger LeCoultre vs Omega Help
Let me start
by first saying that I was originally just looking at the new Omega Planet
Ocean Chrono Titanium Liquid Metal. I
have never owned an Omega but I have heard that this particular model was very
big, thick and heavy on the stainless steel version. This is why I thought the
titanium liquid metal would work better for me since I am not used to wearing
something too heavy. I also was intrigued
with their new in house 9300 caliber movement. There have been so many people talking
about it I also figured that with the combination of new technology (liquid
metal, ceramic, titanium and new in house movement) that this would be a great
watch to purchase. Another thing that I liked about the Omega is that I wanted
something that I can wear for both sporting activities and more elegant for
when you dress up a little nicer. The problem that I am having is that this
particular Omega watch cost $10,600 dollars retail. Even though I have never owned an Omega it
just seems a bit much for me to pay for this watch. I started asking around and others agreed
that it is a bit high to pay for an Omega. I also got a few responses saying
that even though the price is a bit high that it is well worth it because of
the new in house movement and technology that Omega is using. I then got a couple of suggestion telling me
that for that price I should be looking for something better like a JLC Master
Compressor Diver with or without Chrono or Blancpain FF. I had never really
thought of that so I started looking. I ended up liking the JLC MC Diver
Chronograph in titanium 44mm. The one
thing that I have noticed is that the model that I like has been out for a
while and that it is not very easy to find anymore. Also, this
particular model is made of matted titanium and looks very sporty, but doesn’t
seem like you can wear it for more elegant occasions. Now I know JLC has a very
good reputation when it comes to making great time pieces, but how would this
compare to the new Omega? Does this JLC
still stand above Omega or does Omega win on this model due to its new
technology and movement?
I would
really like to hear your thoughts and suggestions. This would be a big purchase
so I would like to make sure that my money is being spent well.

Review
Marcus Hanke · Mar 1, 2014
Marcus Hanke's in-depth review of the Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch Caliber 9300. Explore its unique bi-compax chronograph and design.
16 replies29622 views

Review
Ruckdee · Aug 27, 2011
Ruckdee reviews the 2011 Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Chronograph 45.5mm, discussing its Caliber 9300, design updates, and wearability.
39 replies19086 views

Review
Watch Connoisseur · Jan 25, 2012
Collector debates Omega Planet Ocean Chronograph titanium liquid metal Caliber 9300 vs. stainless steel, price, and technology value.
42 replies18109 views

Lifestyle
holdemchamp1225 · Jul 29, 2020
Explore the Omega Speedmaster Dark Side of the Moon Apollo 8, its design, and community insights on strap choices, including Isofrane and shell cordovan.
79 replies13599 views

Review
WHL · Jun 30, 2013
WHL reviews the Omega Planet Ocean GMT "GoodPlanet" (Cal. 8605). Discover its 43.5mm size, blue dial, ceramic bezel, and Co-Axial movement.
10 replies8319 views

Review
polonorte2 · Oct 11, 2018
Detailed review of the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Chronograph Titanium 232.90.46.51.03.001. Explore wearability, movement, and collector insights.
16 replies7688 views
omega in this case
By: cuibono : January 28th, 2012-05:33
i had a planet ocean, which i loved till it disappeared, and i have a jlc extreme world chrono. i only say this to express my bona fides: i love watches from both brands. in this particular comparison, i think the omega is more versatile. as a strictly ca...
Agree completely
By: ingmar : January 28th, 2012-08:01
The JLC is just too sporty for my tastes. I've owned 2 Planet Ocean watches. The design is a great mix of classic, modern, sport and the new business. But for me they felt too thick. This was with the 2500 calibre so the 8500 is out for me. But it sure lo...
the jlcs are gorgeous
By: cuibono : January 28th, 2012-14:14
the jlcs you picture are fantastic. i've seen one person, and it was great. but i don't think, as i mentioned earlier, it works well in a more formal/business context, and they are pretty thick. i still think the omega might suit your needs better.... chr...
Well....
By: watchme : January 30th, 2012-08:13
I own the Navy Seals Chrono GMT on the articulated rubber (your first picture of it) and LOVE it! I find that it can go dress or sport, due to the black bracelet, dial and bezel. I do like the PO LM - but I like the chrono on the blue rubber best, which i...
NSA for me
By: sgexpat : January 29th, 2012-12:52
First of all, you can't go wrong with these options. It really does come down to your preference. That said, I agree with several commenters who say the MCDC will be a struggle in a dress up situation. I can't see it working with a suit but I guess some p...
watch sizes
By: quattro98 : January 30th, 2012-09:32
I don't know if you have the chance to try these watches on, but if at all possible, please try to see them in person. The new Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean chrono is very thick (as you've posted). Based on the size & thickness of all of these watches,...
Night shots within
By: mcio2 : January 31st, 2012-20:35
I chose this one over the Navy Seal models because for me personally I really like the blue accents on the watch as opposed to the all black of the Navy Seals' watches. The other thing that really swayed me (I know this is going to sound funny) is that I ...