WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

Yes indeed Alex, however there is a ....

 

noticeable difference between timepieces of the XVIIIth century and some among those produced nowadays : the use of new materials.

This can (IMHO shall) be a problem in 20 or 30 years from now as the technics that allow these materials to be used may not be in force anymore AND be out of reach of watch restorers.

Just considere that it is not possible today to repair an Hamilton Pulsar that was produced in the 70s, just because spare part stock are void and no one is able to produced the electronic chip that is inside.

What do you think it will happen for the components that are made of silicium or carbon fiber or any other "exotic" material ?

It is always possible to restore a watch made more than 200 years ago because the material used at that time are still available AND the know-how has been transmitted from masters to apprentices, generation after generation.

To make a steel escape wheel , a skilled watchmaker just needs a workshop and a few machine tools.

To make a silicium escape wheel, one needs a factory with complex industrial procedures.

It will be not a question of cost, the question will be : is it feasible ?

That is the reason why I am very reluctant towards brands that today use these new materials.

Some replies this point by : " Yes, you are right but we anticipate this and our silicium escape wheel can be easily replaced by a steel escape wheel if silicium is no more available "

My reaction is : "So , why using silicium today ? "

And my question to collectors is : "Do you want your watches to be repaired this way ? Do you accept your V12 Ferrari engine to be replaced by a 4-inline-Ford engine, just because aluminium (or any material) is no more available ?"

Ask the watchmakers who have begun their professional life by restoring, I am sure you will get the same approach !

Cheers.

Philippe M

  login to reply
💰15 Marketplace Listings for Hamilton