ektaylor
160
What I like about COSC—and Omega’s METAS—testing is that they refer to a quantitative performance metric that’s highly relevant to me: the watch’s ability to keep accurate time.
The other metrics are concerned with levels of finishing (Geneva seal) or general functionality (JLC 1000 hrs). So they really all mean very different things.
Thoughts on certifications?
By: jleno : July 17th, 2019-21:29
I'm curious what the general opinions on certifications are aside from COSC. Geneva seal, Patek seal, Qualite Fleurier, JLC 1000 hours, etc...Who's got the most stringent? Do they differ in any interesting ways? Or are they all just BS? added image for in...
Thanks for your writeup!
By: jleno : July 18th, 2019-14:02
Fascinating to see how much testing goes into a Grand Seiko! From your visits to other manufacturers, were there any other notable qualities of the certifications or testing processes across brands? I'm particularly interested in better understanding the ...
Fleurier Quality
By: cazalea : July 18th, 2019-15:46
Rules for obtaining the FQF Quality seal The "QUALITE FLEURIER" quality label applies to mechanical watches and finished watches, whether or not these form part of an item of jewellery, that are produced in series in Switzerland. To be awarded the "QUALIT...
Omega METAS
By: cazalea : July 18th, 2019-16:08
DOUBLE CERTIFICATION: METAS AND COSC To own a MASTER CHRONOMETER is to be confident that your watch has been certified not once – but twice! The 8 stringent METAS tests your timepiece must face to earn the title MASTER CHRONOMETER can only begin with move...