clemens m
958
Sounds it was the right thing for you to do as well.
You have only two wrists so if you want to give every watch a fair amount of time where you actually wear the thing then the amount of watches in a collection is limited. Of course there are watches with sentimental value and some watches that are the core pieces of ones collection (for example my Marvin Flying Dutchman in my case - just too special and impossible to find another one with this dial configuration) but the rest is subject to constant change and evolution. Our tastes and financial means evolve as life goes on - so do our watch collections.
I am all for consolidating
By: sham1 : April 24th, 2025-12:03
especially if it is to buy a grail. A watch being rare or irreplaceable is not a good enough reason to keep it. You have to love it. And if you do, don't sell it. But if you merely like a watch, definitely sell it to help finance a grail. I feel I have to...
Good points you make,
By: clemens m : April 24th, 2025-13:56
I am still on the fence between 1-2 pieces but more or less I know which ones will leave my collection. In the end it is all about one loving a certain watch or not, for the personal collection terms like "rarity" or "desirability" are overrated IMHO.
I would consolidate
By: dedestexhes : April 24th, 2025-12:18
I’ve somehow the same challenge, but I’m giving watches that I almost don’t wear anymore to my children ( only the ones they like). And that is irrespective of the watches value , so not making money off them, just giving enjoyment). As long as someone en...
Go for it.
By: mjmccracken : April 24th, 2025-12:47
Otherwise, you’ll forever be thinking about it. And what with how time passes, aging and all…there really is no time like the present. In fact, there’s a perfect specimen out there as we speak (and no, I’m in no way affiliated or associated). Best of luck...
I say get started on it.
By: Steve E : April 24th, 2025-14:42
I found myself with a collection of about 25, but have sold off about half over the last 2-3 years, with more to go. It was the realization that about 75% of those watches were never being worn that moved me to start selling. I do have sellers remorse ove...
Bobby Fischer said -
By: mblum3 : April 24th, 2025-18:26
to get squares, you have to give squares. Unless one is rolling in dough, we're in the same position with watches. It's gone both ways for me. I've been delighted with getting something I'd wanted for a while and don't really miss the pieces I sold. I've ...
It really depends
By: Ichiran : April 25th, 2025-06:11
I was offered a 37mm Simplicity by the manufacture directly but at a very elevated price. I thought long over it because this would mean sacrifices and compromise. In the end I did not proceed with the offer because I think I will enjoy the other watches ...
I feel alike,
By: clemens m : April 25th, 2025-16:54
but after selling most of the "OK but not great" watches I will shift down the tempo a bit and only try to buy less but better watches for a more upscale collection. On the other hand "hunting and flipping" can also be fun just for the sake of the wearing...