We have actually parallel thoughts but in reverse thought patterns. I thought that I'd be showing my bias if I described the winding... I could invite criticism like "Patrick inherently likes automatics more than manuals." I was also trying to be very objective based on the practical need to wind, as I imagine that most PF-702 owners will be mostly relying on the automatic movement and doing only some winding to start the watch off from a stop.
I did wind the PF-702 and found the crown reasonably comfortable. The crown was of a reasonable size and protruded externally the correct amount. I felt it was unnecessary to comment so much about the winding of the PF-702 because the typical user would be winding the watch very little compared to the others where it would be required.
Out of all four of the watches, I personally like the way the Lange 1815 winds, it's a gradual build up and the resistance doesn't build up too much at the end. The Patek Philippe 215-PS movement gets to be fairly tiring by the end as the resistance is noticeable and the crown is small. The Vacheron Constantin Patrimony Traditionelle is between the Patek Philippe and the Lange.
Perhaps the biggest disadvantage all the other three watches faced was that it wasn't exactly an apples to orange comparison, because Parmigiani broke the mold and created the only automatic in the three-hand with high movement finishing segment.
Thanks for reading and for commenting!