ztirual
1269
Hi Ubik,
Well, there is always an exception to confirm the rule... isn't there? ;-)
I believe one of the refs actually has its case sub-number stamped on the back of on lug and on the inner case back, but it is the ref. that one does not see that too often.
Yes, that's what we are assuming. The double stamping ensured matching of those hard pressure hermetic cases. For me they are now more akin to what one would call today a limited edition. It gives us an insight into how few of these pieces were produced withing each case reference. As you know on to of that the same ref. Could often be mounted with quite a variant of dials. Those two features, not mentioning the bauty and the quality of the 13ZN movement, makes those watches very special.
Not really surprising that Longines got back to use hard pressure backs after the emergence of screw backs (3 notches and 6 notches amd later faceted...) we should not imho that what comes next is always better than what came before. The wj]hole history of Longines is a case in point. The immediate after war in Europe was a very hard time up to the beginning of the fifties, and cost levels might well have been a factor.
Kind regards my firend
Hey Z!
By: reficul_x : November 6th, 2016-04:12
Thank you for your comment and obviously you know your stuff! On the case number on the back of lugs, I have seen a few examples without that number too. Though far and few, I do think they exist but I do not know why. On the pushers, I do think they are ...
Hey Z
By: Ubik : December 9th, 2016-09:04
My 2010 doesn't have a lug mark either, I don't believe any of those refs do (although not that many to make an accurate sample) I always assumed the lug number was to ensure that the caseback that was made for the watch, stayed with the watch throughout ...
Hi Ubik,
By: ztirual : December 10th, 2016-06:21
Well, there is always an exception to confirm the rule... isn't there? ;-) I believe one of the refs actually has its case sub-number stamped on the back of on lug and on the inner case back, but it is the ref. that one does not see that too often. Yes, t...
Erratum...
By: ztirual : December 13th, 2016-07:44
Only one valid reference number for the MP's (mushroom pushers) Important to distinguish three things here: 1! Case ref number. That's were there is the most confusion⦠2/ Internal batch number 3/ Possible case serial number within a batch. You can come t...
I'm really happy..
By: i_am_Sam : November 9th, 2016-22:42
You finally got it J ! The 13ZN is also one of my grail watch, not this particular configuration, but I know, the step case with mushroom pusher is the grail for most. Congrats again, and wear it in best health ! Hope to be able to see it soon! Best, Sam
Oops, forgot to add
By: ztirual : December 7th, 2016-13:47
ref. 4270 is not a myth. It exists! I even have a copy of Longines original technical card with period picture for this ref. As you probably know there is an wonderfull little illustration in a 1936 Longines catalogue of a black dialed specimen of this re...