sham1
9744
Thank you for sharing!
I am biased so I like the last one best partly because it is the rarest, partly because it is in steel which arguably gives the watch even better resonance, partly because I love Chopard's take on the salmon dial and partly because mine will be arriving in November! 
An overview of the L.U.C Strike One iterations
First launched in 2006 with an art deco design and an on/off pusher at 10 o’clock (caliber 96 SH), the Strike One has been updated in 2008 with a "tech" opened dial version and then completely transformed in 2022 with a honeycomb design derived from the 1...
Thank you for sharing!
I am biased so I like the last one best partly because it is the rarest, partly because it is in steel which arguably gives the watch even better resonance, partly because I love Chopard's take on the salmon dial and partly because mine will be arriving i...
The last three for me.
Purists would disqualify them due to the “hole in the dial”, and I must admit that it attacks the eye right away due to disruption in austerity of the rest of the dial, however because the minute markers are not chipped away, I like it. Curious to hear th...
I’ve tried on the 2022 rose gold/grey dial version and,
believe me, the hole in the dial is simply not a problem at all. There has to be a visible on/off indicator somewhere (it’s a necessity for the wearer/user) and this little hole is a very nice and discreet way to implement it, imo. As for the sound, it’s ...
I personally have no problem with the disruption.
Same goes for tourbillons, when it’s not too big. But the truth is, we’re a hard crowd to please! LOL.
We sure are.
And I wonder if some of the things we see as problems are not in fact mere chimeras produced by our sometimes overly photo-centric approach to watches.
I think the steel/salmon here, quattro.
(But I'd be very happy with any of the last three).
I'd be too, indeed, but,
being a colored gold guy, even happier with the 2022 rose gold/grey dial!
Very cool watches, which brought to mind this one that I should have bought back in the day.
No dinger on these though. ...
No dinger, but the crown at 4 and small seconds at 7, which is a nice "twist"
(I think it was the name of this collection), and a nice look!
I haven't seen n° 6 in real life,
but it looks great. As for n° 5, I've had the chance to try it on: it's superb!