kakatamad
9
hmm
hi kong,
thanks for your input. i've also posted photos of jlc and chopard in the jlc forum. .
http://jlc.watchprosite.com/show-forumpost/fi-2/pi-3217846/ti-528791/s--5/
as for the design/aesthetics i think i still prefer either the jlc diving gmt or chrono and the happy sport as compared the pro one. in terms of durability and such, which would be better jlc or chopard? i've sought some advise from friends who are watch lovers and they all commented that chopard is a jewelry maker and not actually a watchmaker. but i think this is somewhat a misconception as i've read some history on the brand. i would like something in between, like sporty but still a little feminine. i've also looked at some watches like the rolex yachtmaster but trying to narrow down my choices.
=)
mch
Available on the marketplace
Welcome Mch!
By: Kong : June 21st, 2009-11:06
Hi Mch Understand Amanico has provided you the inputs for JLC. As for Chopard, the Happy series are mainly quartz. If you are looking for mechanical diving GMT watch, will have to request you take a look at the Chopard L.U.C line, and the model is L.U.C P...
hmm
By: kakatamad : June 21st, 2009-19:34
hi kong, thanks for your input. i've also posted photos of jlc and chopard in the jlc forum. . http://jlc.watchprosite.com/show-forumpost/fi-2/pi-3217846/ti-528791/s--5/ as for the design/aesthetics i think i still prefer either the jlc diving gmt or chro...
question..
By: kakatamad : June 21st, 2009-21:51
hi kong, thanks for the link. i shall look into it. my question is, when you say that there's an higher chance to have an issue with a mechanical one...what issues are you talking about? honestly, i dont know much about watches but i would think that a qu...
It is probability (to me)...
By: Kong : June 22nd, 2009-02:18
I hope I did not frighten you and I hope I can explain well in words. Mechanical watches are made of up of many components interacting with each others versus a chip which has all the connections already hard-wired in wafer form, and no moving parts. Thus...
