WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Blancpain

I am the guy who reached out to Blancpain, and later had a convo with Tim M.

 

First post here, so hello everyone!

I will start by saying I appreciate this post and it was super interesting. Nicely done!

Now how did I get here? Funnily enough, I was scanning the internet for some nice 1315 macros to drool over (as one usually does), just to come across this thread almost a year too late. Being a fan of the Fifty Fathoms, I have basically watched every single one of Tim's reviews and started to notice he changed his wording a little in the later reviews about the subject of the bevels. It got me curious so I reached out to Blancpain and you can see their response in Tim's post here. I have the original email of their response, and I was searching for my own formulation of the question and how I worded it. But to no avail. The way you ask questions on Blancpain's website is you fill in the form and they get back to you. So I can not see my original question, and it was not attached in their response either. 

Since it was a year ago I reached out to Blancpain, I can not remember exactly how my question was worded. Why does it matter? Because it could be a matter of semantics and definition of words, as has been discussed here also. Is machine rotary tool used by human hands considered hand finishing or by machine, according to Blancpain themselves? This is not clear from their email. 

Also, partly what I discussed with TIm on our email thread, regarding finish of different brands in general. I believe it is probably naive to think Blancpain is sitting there with gentian wood and some polishing compound to polish each bevel by hand for hours on hours (Dufour style), considering their pricepoint. However, there is a possibility that they use machine hand held rotary buffing tools for a second pass, which could be considered as machine finish or hand finish depending on who you ask. 

After Tim mentioned Omega's cal 1863 multiple times, I had a look as well and those bevels look very impressive indeed, at an even more "affordable" price. Even the tiny chronograph steel parts are impressively mirror bevelled. I believe Andrew Morgan has some nice movement macros on some of the older Watchfinder Speedy videos. I have not researched Omega's cal 1863 too much, but are we 100% certain there is no human touch involved there? Because, If Omega's 1863 is never touched by human hands and they still achieved that level of finish, it could be reasonable to think a similar techonogy was used on Blancpain's 1315.

Taking a step back, I get it that it might be important for some people in the community to know the details regarding movement finish and so on, which is why I asked Blancpain in the first place. But in the bigger picture, the 1315 bevels are still very impressive, and seem to be nicer than many other brands (cough cough - let us not mention any names) that cost multiple times more who showcase much more of the machining bite marks on the bevel of the bridges.

Have a nice weekend everyone!

Best regards,
Kevin

  login to reply
💰364 Marketplace Listings for Omega