Blansky
3074
Agree. To me the coupe version of the Maserati is far nicer than the convertible.
That whole roof line just makes the car and the overall design holds together better.
1967 Maserati Mistral, Coupé.
A very sensual one, even more than the convertible version. The Coupé: The Convertible is less pure... In comparison: Best, Nicolas ...
In this rare case, I much
prefer the convertible while both are magnificent I think. Cheers Marc
The front end and roof line in the back are to die for.
I'm not really up on European cars but the roofline/back end are similar to the 1968 Bristol in the new Lynley series.
Agree. To me the coupe version of the Maserati is far nicer than the convertible.
That whole roof line just makes the car and the overall design holds together better.
A few drives with this car in the South of France
Matches the name. Regardless of coupe or convertible as long as two seats.
A proper old school GT 🙌🏻👏🏻
The design is sufficiently edgy and the interior a sublime place to cross continents in 😊👍🏻
You have been doing it since childhood 😉👍🏻
Paris to Istanbul is technically feasible in two days but a bit more relaxed in 3, of you’re taking the Mistral 👌🏻
That really is such a beautiful Maserati Mistral, Coupé from 1967.
I have to agree with you the coupe looks so much nicer than the convertible. It is such a shame but they just don't make them how they used to anymore. If I was lucky enough to have a choice between this or any of the modern day supercars I know which one...
A beautiful Frua design indeed.
However, in my humble opinion, the AC 428 Frua is even better looking and being fitted with a reliable Ford V8 would make a very reliable grand tourer, even today! ...