Comments:
Load More Comments >>
1967 Maserati Mistral, Coupé.
A very sensual one, even more than the convertible version.
The Coupé:
The Convertible is less pure... In comparison:
Best,
Nicolas
In this rare case, I much
prefer the convertible while both are magnificent I think.
Cheers
Marc
Cheers
Marc
The front end and roof line in the back are to die for.
I'm not really up on European cars but the roofline/back end are similar to the 1968 Bristol in the new Lynley series.
It looks like that was wrong. It appears that both versions of the Lynley series were Jensen Interceptors.
Agree. To me the coupe version of the Maserati is far nicer than the convertible.
That whole roof line just makes the car and the overall design holds together better.
💯. Coupe wins. It is in amazing condition. The color way is perfect. The dash instrumentation, steering wheel, hand brake…perfecto🥰
Truly awesome. I’ve always loved the fat tires on wire wheels. I don’t like low-profile tires. Matching wood for steering wheel and stick shift, beautiful. I like!
A few drives with this car in the South of France
Matches the name. Regardless of coupe or convertible as long as two seats.
A proper old school GT 🙌🏻👏🏻
The design is sufficiently edgy and the interior a sublime place to cross continents in 😊👍🏻
You have been doing it since childhood 😉👍🏻
Paris to Istanbul is technically feasible in two days but a bit more relaxed in 3, of you’re taking the Mistral 👌🏻
That really is such a beautiful Maserati Mistral, Coupé from 1967.
I have to agree with you the coupe looks so much nicer than the convertible. It is such a shame but they just don't make them how they used to anymore. If I was lucky enough to have a choice between this or any of the modern day supercars I know which one I would choose in a heartbeat.
Marc