Saw this one first in September in Scotland & now further chance to see it again in london at an AP event
Feb 25, 2023,01:01 AM
What’s the big deal ? Iam not sure but a great fun expensive toy..
Comments: view entire thread
It's cool. But not a classic!
By: patrick_y : February 25th, 2023-01:16
It's cool for today, but would I still like it after a few years? Possibly not. It's too in-the-moment.
By: amanico : February 25th, 2023-06:09
By: ArmisT : February 26th, 2023-01:49
Can I ask why the time only instead of the chrono version? Also, what did you think of the beige smoked dial piece with ceramic middle?
I Like It
By: Tim_M : February 25th, 2023-02:10
But I like strange watches and colorful watches, and this is both. Scratch resistance and perpetual calendars also are high on my priority list. But I suspect it's a short-run niche model for people like me and unlikely to become part of the canon. Green ...
Not for me.
By: HelixL : February 25th, 2023-17:00
I was also at the event in AP House and did get to see it IRL. Trying not to be biased here given I own two black ceramic RO’s, this one feels different. It’s less everyday and more of a once in a while in a large collection watch. Whilst color feels toy-...
By: KCLQMULKU : February 25th, 2023-19:12
Same feedback as others!
By: pfang56 : February 25th, 2023-22:43
Special today maybe strange tomorrow - but it's your wrist not mine Would prefer the white over the blue one! Peter
Had to do this...
By: pfang56 : February 26th, 2023-15:55
My ideal ceramic model would be a 16202 in grey cermet Second would be black ceramic. With 100m of water resistance. I don't think I would ever take that one off Cheers Peter ...
Rare and amazing 😻
By: Horology75 : February 28th, 2023-06:07
I would be inclined towards time only 41mm RO . Found the beast to be small on my worst and sits very high . Perpetual out of the budget and the later too small .
Is the blue
By: GLau : March 11th, 2023-17:04
very bright in the metal ? I would like the color to be more subdue.