Basic RL is a 3/4 plate modified...

Jul 31, 2016,01:05 AM
 

Such that it has an extra bridge for the central seconds geartrain vs eg a 1815 or Saxonia time only. Having watches with central seconds are therefore a little thicker due to this bridge. It doesn't have a constant force unlike the plm and plm tourbillon with fusee chain, the zeitwerk, the terraluna, or the lange 31.

The RL central seconds nevertheless, is beautiful due to having large central seconds and 1/5 subsecond marking for precision. The added central seconds bridge adds some movement relative depth. And yes, it has a nice Breguet (?) Overcoil for the hairspring that is absent from entry level 1815 or Saxonia!
Regards,
skyeriding


More posts: 1815Lange 31Richard LangeRichard Lange Perpetual CalendarSaxoniaZeitwerk

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Three "hand watches"

 
 By: Amaan : July 30th, 2016-20:59
Hi all, Amazing how different a three handed watch can be. Cheers J...  

A lovely pair of pink gold Langes you have there!

 
 By: jrwong23 (aka watchthebin) : July 30th, 2016-22:26
Both are super high end time only watches, with constant force escapement! Discreet watches with superb engines to boot! Cheers robin

Thanks Robin.

 
 By: Amaan : July 30th, 2016-22:28
I don\'t use them enough so today is a good day to get their engines revving. Thanks for the kind words. Cheers J

Thats the RL, not the Pour Le Merite

 
 By: skyeriding : July 30th, 2016-22:49
..Categorised by having 1/5 subsecond markings, central seconds. The PLM has an enamel dial, subseconds at 6 and no subsecond markings Nevertheless, still a very, very sexy watch! The pink gold Zeitwerk looks really good in companion shots like these with... 

I thought the basic RL has constant force escapement as well?

 
 By: jrwong23 (aka watchthebin) : July 30th, 2016-23:25
Not just the PLM?

Basic RL is a 3/4 plate modified...

 
 By: skyeriding : July 31st, 2016-01:05
Such that it has an extra bridge for the central seconds geartrain vs eg a 1815 or Saxonia time only. Having watches with central seconds are therefore a little thicker due to this bridge. It doesn't have a constant force unlike the plm and plm tourbillon...  

Ah I see!

 
 By: jrwong23 (aka watchthebin) : July 31st, 2016-06:13
Thank you very much for the detailed clarification. Now I get it

Absolutely right

 
 By: Amaan : July 30th, 2016-23:26
Many thanks. Cheers

Cool thanks!

 
 By: jrwong23 (aka watchthebin) : July 31st, 2016-00:10
I was confused when skyeriding mentioned it is the RL and not PLM - I thought he thought I meant yours was a PLM and not the basic RL when I mentioned both the Zeitwerk and RL have a constant force escapement Cheers Robin

skyeriding is right...

 
 By: Dufourism : July 31st, 2016-03:13
The bread and butter RL does not have any kind of constant force mechanism like a fusee & chain or remontoire so to speak. The way a normal RL achieves a constant-force-like timekeeping results is by cutting power to the watch at the 38th hour mark (w... 

Thanks for the detailed clarification

 
 By: jrwong23 (aka watchthebin) : July 31st, 2016-06:12
ok now I recall - at my Lange akademie I learned that the RL is very accurate and precise for 38 hours and they restrict the power reserve at 38 hours to ensure the torque is constant for 38 hours. I mistook this for constant force escapement . Thanks a l... 

I hate to be pedantic..

 
 By: Tiggermelad : August 2nd, 2016-20:40
...but the RL has markings of 1/6 second (not 1/5). The movement beats at 21,600 per hour, which is 6 per second so each mark corresponds to one tick.

I only know..

 
 By: Tiggermelad : August 2nd, 2016-21:53
...because I was looking at buying one recently and that struck me as odd - 1/5 seems much more logical!

1/5 should be used more often...

 
 By: skyeriding : August 2nd, 2016-23:11
It is a more meaningful number especially for timing precision in my opinion. You can easily write down 2.4 seconds, but not 2.16667 seconds! Also, 1/5 to me is more aesthetically pleasing and less crammed. At least, not as bad as certain watches with mis... 

Excuse my ignorance

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : July 30th, 2016-23:19
Where is third hand on Zeitwerk? Beautiful shot of amazing watches Cheers D

6 o'clock

 
 By: Amaan : July 30th, 2016-23:27

It's not in the photo. The 3rd hand belongs to the watch owner! LOL [nt]

 
 By: Dufourism : July 31st, 2016-03:35
The hand wearing the watch is the 3rd hand!

:))) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 31st, 2016-04:22

No matter how many hands these watches have,

 
 By: TheMadDruid : July 31st, 2016-05:18
it's nice to see them juxtaposed. Typically we see the ZW as a stand-alone. It is actually beautifully contrasted with the RL to show two very different ways Lange lets us tell time. The photo is gorgeous, as are the watches.

Both time only, both stunning, both with movements....

 
 By: alphabeta81 : August 3rd, 2016-13:49
.... that make Patek cry No but seriously, I have owned both, miss both, they are both truly special. Your picture is wonderfully composed by the way