dr.kol
11333
I do not think Patek informed the numbers of London pieces.
Aug 01, 2019,13:16 PM
What I heard was "maximum 5 each".
Best, Kari
Comments:
view entire thread
I went to the Saatchi exhibition
By: VinnieD : August 18th, 2019-23:53
And had followed the limited releases at the time I do not have a specific web source for this
London. Exhibition.
By: Miles_151 : August 1st, 2019-14:52
And from what I have been informed max 5 is correct and less for some. M.
Stunning "Vintage" 5970J
By: tahoeblue : August 1st, 2019-22:21
I don't think it is quite correct to say that these "vintage series" watches (such as this 5970J with brown dial) were produced for the London Exhibition, even though that is where they were first shown. Several were sold some years later. Or maybe 5 were...
😍👍👍 [nt]
By: roppfan : August 4th, 2019-03:35
wow, 17 ??
By: GLau : August 19th, 2019-10:25
where did you hear that Karl ??
Sadly all of it is urban legend...each of us
By: Patekphilippecollector : August 20th, 2019-02:34
Has sources that have the inside track (so they say) but who really knows without a shadow of a doubt. Have to wonder why on some of the releases PP didnt give the actual number???
Where did Patek say it's an LE of 5?
By: Patekphilippecollector : August 21st, 2019-03:59
On the 3940 / 5070 / 5950 I dont believe they did....my question is they did for the 5159 etc so why not these
Well then it would be nice to have it in the
By: Patekphilippecollector : August 21st, 2019-05:21
Public domain to cut out speculation once and for all. Collected Man quoted "believe less than 10" K2 about 5 but it still begs the question why it wasnt published...what's the secret? As a side I sourced the 3940 a friend and there was no indication of ...