chippie

And a strangely good value, so to speak. When you look at other independents etc etc. I love these watches. I get that they are somewhat controversial, because of the explosion of finishes on the movement, but already the movement here is less...

It's OK. I don't understand why Patek 'messes' with such great DNA. Not a whole lot needs doing here. Why the odd-shaped hands? They aren't quite right, are they, on a Patek? The movement, so, so, so pedestrian on such a watch. The date wheel in...

especially the chronograph. Whew!!! I'm on the fence about whether I actually like the movement. That is different than 'does it impress me?' It obviously blows me away. Yet, do I like it in the way it's designed? It feels over the top, even after...

at least on this site. But Rolex doesn't need our help, chuckle. I personally flipped when I saw it, but shrug, nobody is getting this watch unless, well, you know the game. I honestly do feel it is overall a better bet going straight to the gray...

Movado hasn't done much lately that I like. But the design here is iconic and in gold or gold fill/plate it is definitely unique. As for getting it in quartz, this watch does not typify a quartz watch--I mean, there's not a good reason to get it...

But it's still a demerit, unfairly, but still for JLC. They have to be one step ahead of design 'thieves' even if the thievery is an homage or simply classic design--JLC must play better chess. With that said, I like the new JLC Masters a lot, and of...

But that is what we fools can't get enough of.

I bet you had fun. Thanks!!

Great pics. I always wonder with this watch, though, if the lower 'arrowheads' of the hands cross into the top of the sub seconds, and if they do, I feel the sub seconds is too high up. I generally feel that way about this dial, either way. It's such...

The Everest, of course, is being somewhat cannibalized. Not sure how I would feel if I owned one. BUT. I love that these are Ti. I love the textured Everest-like dials and detail. The AM/PM is hokey and silly, and always was, yet--why is it so...