smironov
1113
Thanks Emmanuel!
So, looks like, 16.31 is at least as good if not better technically but much better finished. Where Venus wins is the rarity and historical significance. Agree?
Thank you, Dirk!
By: quattro : June 8th, 2025-13:51
Your message made me realise that I forgot to include the photos of the movement, that were patiently waiting to get uploaded on my computer. I got distracted and forgot, but thanks to you, I've been able to complete my post... Thanks again! Best, Emmanue...
A few more
By: MrkK : June 8th, 2025-16:42
1. ref 511-51 from 1984 oor 1985. AFAIK it is one of the first watches released by UN after Rolf Schnyder acquired the company. 6 or 7 were released with this dial. I was told by UN that the numerals of the dial aren't painted, but the dial is executed in...
It does indeed!
By: quattro : June 9th, 2025-06:55
And I'm happy to see that no-one is blaming the 14 mm thickness here, whereas thickness has been the main target of criticism concerning the new Urban Jรผrgensen models, which ironically are all beneath 14 mm! Best, Emmanuel
Hi Smironov,
By: quattro : June 9th, 2025-06:55
My technical knowledge is unfortunately too limited to tell the exact differences between the Venus 179 and the MB 16.31 . But, looking at these two photos side by side, I can spot two differences : The MB 16.31 has a more sophisticated regulator of the b...